Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

dateDropper Javascript VS fish shell

Compare dateDropper Javascript VS fish shell and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

dateDropper Javascript logo dateDropper Javascript

The lightest and the most complete javascript date picker

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.
  • dateDropper Javascript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-26
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23

dateDropper Javascript features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    dateDropper offers a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to select dates without much hassle.
  • Customizable
    The plugin is highly customizable, allowing developers to modify its appearance and behavior to fit their project's needs.
  • Responsive Design
    It is designed to be responsive, ensuring it works well on different screen sizes and devices.
  • Lightweight
    dateDropper is lightweight, which helps in reducing the overall load time of the webpage.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    The plugin supports multiple languages, making it suitable for international websites.

Possible disadvantages of dateDropper Javascript

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While dateDropper is great for basic date picking, it lacks advanced features found in some other date-picker libraries, which might be necessary for complex applications.
  • Third-party Dependency
    Being a third-party plugin, it adds an external dependency to your project, which might require additional maintenance.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    There might be some compatibility issues with older browsers, which can affect user experience.
  • Paid License
    Some features or versions may require a paid license, which could be a barrier for projects with a limited budget.
  • Customization Complexity
    Although customizable, accessing and modifying the deep customization options might require a good understanding of its documentation and underlying code.

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

dateDropper Javascript videos

+ Add

TimeDropper 2.0 Competition Level Swimming Goggles Commercial

fish shell videos

+ Add

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to dateDropper Javascript and fish shell)

dateDropper Javascript

fish shell

Developer Tools
14 14%
Developer Tools
86% 86
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
Cryptocurrencies
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Blockchain
0 0%
Blockchain
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using dateDropper Javascript and fish shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 134 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

dateDropper Javascript mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of dateDropper Javascript yet. Tracking of dateDropper Javascript recommendations started around Mar 2021.

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing dateDropper Javascript and fish shell, you can also consider the following products

JavaScript Operator Lookup - A full list of JavaScript operators with examples

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

JavaScript Quiz - Check your knowledge by having fun.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

JavaScript.com - A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.

Loading...