Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

D (Programming Language) VS MobX

Compare D (Programming Language) VS MobX and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

D (Programming Language) logo D (Programming Language)

D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

MobX logo MobX

Simple, scalable state management
  • D (Programming Language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09
  • MobX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-04-24

D (Programming Language) features and specs

  • Performance
    D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
  • Expressiveness
    D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
  • Memory Safety
    D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
  • Interoperability
    D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
  • Built-in Unit Testing
    D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
  • Concurrency
    D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages of D (Programming Language)

  • Adoption
    D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
  • Toolchain Maturity
    While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
  • Learning Curve
    D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
  • Garbage Collection
    Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
  • Ecosystem
    The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
  • Standard Library Documentation
    The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

MobX features and specs

  • Simplicity
    MobX allows developers to manage state in a simple and straightforward manner. Its API is minimal and doesn't impose the rigid structure that other state management libraries might require.
  • Reactivity
    The library provides powerful reactive state management, meaning that it automatically updates the UI when the underlying data changes, minimizing boilerplate code.
  • Performance
    MobX optimizes re-rendering by tracking dependencies precisely, making updates efficient and reducing unnecessary renders.
  • Integration
    MobX can easily integrate with React and other JavaScript frameworks, making it flexible for use in various types of projects.

Possible disadvantages of MobX

  • Learning Curve
    While MobX is straightforward for simple use cases, understanding its reactivity and decorators might be challenging for beginners.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large applications, the unstructured nature of MobX might lead to spaghetti code if not managed properly, making it harder to maintain.
  • Less Community Support
    Compared to other state management libraries like Redux, MobX has a smaller community, which could mean fewer resources for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Loose Structure
    The lack of rigid structure, while contributing to simplicity, can result in code that is harder to manage, especially in larger applications where a more organized approach might be beneficial.

Analysis of D (Programming Language)

Overall verdict

  • Overall, D is a solid programming language choice that balances performance with productivity. It may not be as widely adopted as some other languages, but it has a dedicated community and continues to evolve, making it a viable option for various programming tasks.

Why this product is good

  • The D programming language is considered good by many developers for various reasons. It combines the performance and low-level control of C/C++ with the expressive power and ease of use found in modern languages. D offers features like garbage collection, first-class functions, and compile-time function execution, providing both speed and flexibility. Its interoperability with C, the convenience of a powerful standard library (Phobos), and the availability of packages via the DUB package manager make it a practical choice for systems programming, application development, and rapid prototyping.

Recommended for

  • System programming enthusiasts looking for an alternative to C/C++
  • Developers interested in writing high-performance applications
  • Programmers who appreciate modern language features and strong community support
  • Projects requiring seamless C integration
  • Individuals looking for a language that supports easy code maintenance and scalability

D (Programming Language) videos

+ Add

D Language Tutorial

MobX videos

+ Add

MobX vs Redux (A MobX Redux comparison)

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MobX tutorial #1 - MobX + React is AWESOME
  • Review - Introduction to MobX & React in 2020
  • Tutorial - MobX in React Tutorial - Scalable State Management
  • Review - Battlefield Developer Tells The Secrets of MobX Nested Stores

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to D (Programming Language) and MobX)

D (Programming Language)

MobX

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
OOP
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
Front-End Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using D (Programming Language) and MobX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, D (Programming Language) should be more popular than MobX. It has been mentiond 56 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

D (Programming Language) mentions (56)

  • Koto Programming Language
    >For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. I cannot agree more that's the much needed sweet spot/Goldilock/etc. Personally I have been advocating this approach for some times. Apparently the language is already widely available and currently has stable and wide compiler support including the venerable GNU compiler suite (GDC). It... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Apple didn't fix Swift's biggest flaw
    Those languages are definitely with us, https://dlang.org/ https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi https://www.mikroe.com/mikropascal-arm https://www.eiffel.com/ https://www.ptc.com/en/products/developer-tools/objectada. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Berry is a ultra-lightweight dynamically typed embedded scripting language
    Show examples on the main web page. Try and find an AngelScript example. It's stupidly hard. Compare it to these web sites: https://dlang.org/ https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/index.html https://vale.dev/ http://mu-script.org/ https://go.dev/ https://www.hylo-lang.org/ Sadly Rust fails this too but at least the Playground is only one click away. And Rust is mainstream anyway so it doesn't matter as much. I... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Small Joys with Odin
    >and D The D language, that is. https://dlang.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Red Programming Language
    You are both right it seems. GP seems to have omitted withour GC. Number one on your list could be Dlang no? Not affiliated. https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

MobX mentions (20)

  • Getting started with TiniJS framework
    States can also be organized in some central places (aka. stores). You can use Tini Store (very simple, ~50 lines) or other state management solutions such as MobX, TinyX, ... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Episode 24/13: Native Signals, Details on Angular/Wiz, Alan Agius on the Angular CLI
    Similarly to Promises/A+, this effort focuses on aligning the JavaScript ecosystem. If this alignment is successful, then a standard could emerge, based on that experience. Several framework authors are collaborating here on a common model which could back their reactivity core. The current draft is based on design input from the authors/maintainers of Angular, Bubble, Ember, FAST, MobX, Preact, Qwik, RxJS, Solid,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • React State Management in 2024
    Mutable-based: leverages proxy to create mutable data sources which can be directly written to or reactively read from. Candidates in this group are MobX and Valtio. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Cami.js – A No Build, Web Component Based Reactive Framework
    Looks good! FWIW I always felt the observable pattern much more intuitive than the redux/reducer style. Something like https://mobx.js.org/ Things get hairy in both, but redux pattern feels so ridiculously ceremonially to effectively manage a huge global state object with a false sense of "purity". Observables otoh say "fuck it, I'm mutating everything, do what you want with it". - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • React Redux
    It's important to note that Redux is just one of many options for global state management in a React application. Other popular options include MobX and the React context API.context API](https://reactjs.org/docs/context.html). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing D (Programming Language) and MobX, you can also consider the following products

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

vuex - Centralized State Management for Vue.js

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Recoiljs - A state management library for React.

Loading...