Software Alternatives & Reviews

Cypress.io VS Capybara

Compare Cypress.io VS Capybara and see what are their differences

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cypress.io and Capybara)
Automated Testing
86 86%
14% 14
Browser Testing
89 89%
11% 11
Testing
75 75%
25% 25
Website Testing
91 91%
9% 9

User comments

Share your experience with using Cypress.io and Capybara. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cypress.io and Capybara

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Capybara Reviews

We have no reviews of Capybara yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io should be more popular than Capybara. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cypress.io mentions (26)

  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 1 year ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: about 1 year ago
  • React, Vite and TypeScript: Get started in under 2 minutes
    You might have noticed the e2e folder. That's a fully-functioning setup of Cypress for doing integration-level or even full end-to-end tests. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cypress.io and Capybara, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...