Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CSS Scan VS W3C Markup Validation Service

Compare CSS Scan VS W3C Markup Validation Service and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CSS Scan logo CSS Scan

Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

W3C Markup Validation Service logo W3C Markup Validation Service

Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.
  • CSS Scan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-14
  • W3C Markup Validation Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-30

CSS Scan features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CSS Scan offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers of all skill levels to inspect and copy CSS styles directly from the browser.
  • Time-Saving
    It significantly reduces the time needed to debug and replicate styles by allowing quick copying of well-structured CSS rules from any element on the page.
  • Accuracy
    The tool ensures that the copied CSS maintains the exact styling, including computed styles and vendor prefixes, providing high accuracy in replication.
  • Live Edits
    CSS Scan enables live editing of styles, allowing developers to make real-time changes and see the results instantly, which is beneficial for testing and adjustments.
  • Visual Representation
    The extension visually displays how CSS rules are applied, making it easier to understand complex styling hierarchies and cascades.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Scan

  • Cost
    CSS Scan is a paid tool, so there is a financial investment required, which might not be feasible for all developers, especially those working on personal or non-commercial projects.
  • Browser Compatibility
    As a browser extension, its functionality may be limited to supported browsers, potentially excluding users of less common or unsupported browsers.
  • Limited Scope
    While CSS Scan is powerful for copying and analyzing CSS, it does not offer features for editing or managing CSS files directly, requiring another tool or manual intervention for those tasks.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a third-party tool can be a downside if the tool experiences downtime, changes its pricing, or ceases development, leaving users in a difficult position.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Using browser extensions can raise privacy concerns, as they typically have access to the pages you visit; ensuring the trustworthiness of the extension is crucial.

W3C Markup Validation Service features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    The W3C Markup Validation Service ensures that your web pages conform to established web standards, helping to improve web interoperability and accessibility.
  • Error Identification
    The service identifies errors and warnings in your HTML and XHTML documents, making it easier to debug and fix these issues to improve code quality.
  • Improved Compatibility
    By validating your markup, you can better ensure that your web pages are compatible with various browsers and devices, providing a more consistent user experience.
  • Free of Charge
    The validation service is provided by W3C at no cost, making it an accessible tool for developers of all levels to enhance their web projects.
  • Educational Tool
    For beginners in web development, the W3C Validator can serve as an educational resource by highlighting common mistakes and promoting best practices in coding.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Markup Validation Service

  • Limited to Syntax
    The validator primarily checks for syntax errors and does not assess other vital web development aspects such as design or functionality.
  • Outdated Standards
    The tool relies on W3C's standards, which can sometimes lag behind real-world usage and popular web development trends, potentially limiting its relevance.
  • Overly Strict
    The validator can be overly strict, flagging non-critical issues that may not impact user experience but are still considered 'errors' by the tool.
  • Misinterpretation of Results
    Less experienced developers might misinterpret the validator's results, focusing too much on achieving perfect validation without understanding the real impact on usability.
  • Lack of Support for Modern Frameworks
    As a markup validator, it might not fully support or correctly evaluate modern JavaScript frameworks that generate markup dynamically.

CSS Scan videos

+ Add

Chrome CSS Viewer CSS Scan 2.0 - All Your CSS Secrets Revealed

More videos:

  • Review - CSS Scan and Microthemer are buddies

W3C Markup Validation Service videos

+ Add

A Walkthrough the W3C Markup Validation Service

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Scan and W3C Markup Validation Service)

CSS Scan

W3C Markup Validation Service

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
SEO
0 0%
SEO
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
SEO Tools
0 0%
SEO Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Scan and W3C Markup Validation Service. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, W3C Markup Validation Service should be more popular than CSS Scan. It has been mentiond 98 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Scan mentions (13)

View more

W3C Markup Validation Service mentions (98)

  • HTML Validation
    How to use HTML Validation service 👇 Step 1: Access the HTML validator ● Open the HTML validator in your web browser i.e go to https://validator.w3.org/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • WebKit Fix: Quirk News.Y Combinator to Skip TextAutoSizing
    Looking at the html of HN's pages, can't blame them really. Running though https://validator.w3.org/ , the result is abysmal. At this rate, if web browsers started requiring sites to output HTML that is somewhere in the realm of normalcy, HN would sooner shut down than consider ever updating. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • We Need to Talk More About Conformance, If We Want to Stop Fantasy HTML
    Whether you’re a frontend developer, lead, or manager, reconsider your expectations and practices if you haven’t yet chosen not to ship erroneous HTML. The more of us decide to talk about using actual HTML on our sites and in our apps, and lead by example, the better for our users and clients, and the better for our craft and profession. On the engineering side of web development, it’s HTML first—if it is HTML. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What is cross-browser compatibility, and why should you care?
    Validate Your Code Include tools like W3C code validation service and CSS validator to ensure your code meets web standards. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What You Need to Know About Domain and Hosting
    ===> Click here to run your code through the HTML validator. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Scan and W3C Markup Validation Service, you can also consider the following products

CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

Total Validator - Total Validator can check your website to help ensure that it is accessible, uses valid HTML and CSS, has no broken links, and is free from spelling mistakes.

Loading...