Based on our record, Jasmine should be more popular than CSS Scan. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
CSS Scan and CSS Pro are two of the best chrome extensions for front-end developers I know of. https://getcssscan.com/ https://csspro.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: almost 2 years ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 2 years ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: over 2 years ago
Apart from that, there is a lot of common ground regarding testing. All three contenders support the testing tools that many of you use and love, whether it is Jest, Jasmine, and Mocha for unit testing or Cypress, Playwright, and — of course — Selenium for end-to-end testing, among others. A shallow learning curve will be ahead if you want to use these testing tools. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Greetings, another week another lab this week covered the topic of automated testing. When selecting a test framework my first thought was to use Jasmine, which I had used previously, however it turns out that Jasmine does not have good support for ES modules. After doing a bit of research I opted to go with Vitest, since it was ES module compatible, and was inter-compatible with the very popular Vite tool chain. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Jasmine is renowned for its simplicity and is a popular choice for JavaScript testing. Here are its key features:. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Vitest makes it effortless to migrate from Jest. It supports the same Jasmine like API. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Mochajs - Mocha is a JavaScript test framework running on Node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.
QUnit - What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!