Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CSS Scan VS Hugo

Compare CSS Scan VS Hugo and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CSS Scan logo CSS Scan

Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • CSS Scan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-14
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

CSS Scan videos

+ Add

Chrome CSS Viewer CSS Scan 2.0 - All Your CSS Secrets Revealed

More videos:

  • Review - CSS Scan and Microthemer are buddies

Hugo videos

+ Add

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Scan and Hugo)

CSS Scan

Hugo

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
Static Site Generators
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Scan and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CSS Scan and Hugo

CSS Scan Reviews

We have no reviews of CSS Scan yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
If you are looking for a powerful static website generator, Hugo is a good alternative to Next.js. You can build multilingual websites much faster and in a simple way that no other platform will offer you. Furthermore, this platform will increase your experience in creating websites with beautiful Markdown syntax and pre-built features like commenting.
Source: www.zegocloud.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Certainly. Jekyll and Hugo are popular static site generators that don’t rely on React.js. Jekyll uses Ruby, while Hugo is renowned for its speed and simplicity. These options are excellent for projects focusing on content-driven sites without heavy JavaScript frameworks.
Source: tms-outsource.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan. While we know about 358 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 12 mentions of CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Scan mentions (12)

  • I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
    Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
    > Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ditch Inspect Element Forever with CSS Scanner
    A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Has anyone used cssscan?
    I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • 57 CSS Shapes examples, click to copy ✨
    🔺 A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: 👉 https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Hugo mentions (358)

  • Cloud Resume Challenge - Chunk 3
    This required me to revisit my Hugo website. I opened up the developer tools in Edge to figure out which section was which to decide where I wanted to place my hit counter. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
  • Cloud Resume Challenge Chunk 1
    I am not a front-end web developer, and UI/UX design is not one of my skills. So, rather than fumble around trying to make my resume webpage look good, I decided to use a static website generator. I chose to use Hugo, since they have a lot of templates to choose from. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to deploy your own website on AWS
    Hugo Existing themes will get you a website quick, such that you only have to modify color schemes and layouts. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Good alternatives to Heroku
    And last but not least, Netlify, which is the one I use to host this website(for free). Hugo + Netlify is a powerful combination. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Scan and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...