Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CSS Scan Pro VS PCem

Compare CSS Scan Pro VS PCem and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CSS Scan Pro logo CSS Scan Pro

The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

PCem logo PCem

PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...
  • CSS Scan Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • PCem Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

CSS Scan Pro features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    CSS Scan Pro offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Time-saving
    It allows users to quickly inspect and copy CSS, significantly speeding up the workflow and reducing development time.
  • Accurate CSS Extraction
    The tool provides precise CSS extraction, ensuring that you get exactly the styles applied to an element without any unnecessary code.
  • Live Preview
    CSS Scan Pro features a live preview function that lets users see changes in real-time, helping in faster decision-making and better design accuracy.
  • Cross-browser Support
    It supports all major browsers, allowing for consistent CSS extraction and design across different environments.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize the settings to meet their specific needs, such as changing the format of the copied CSS code.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Scan Pro

  • Price
    CSS Scan Pro is a premium tool, and its cost might be prohibitive for some individuals or small teams who are on a tight budget.
  • Browser Extension Requirement
    It requires installation as a browser extension, which might be a barrier for users who are restricted from installing extensions due to organizational policies.
  • Limited to CSS
    While excellent for CSS, it doesn't offer functionalities for other development aspects like JavaScript or HTML, limiting its all-in-one utility.
  • Learning Curve
    Though generally user-friendly, there might be a slight learning curve for absolute beginners unfamiliar with browser extensions or CSS tools.

PCem features and specs

  • High Compatibility
    PCem is known for its high compatibility with a wide range of older PC systems, allowing users to emulate various hardware configurations from the '80s and '90s.
  • Wide OS Support
    PCem supports a variety of operating systems, allowing users to run DOS, Windows 95, 98, and many other legacy systems.
  • Authentic Experience
    By emulating the hardware at a low level, PCem provides an experience that is very close to using an actual vintage PC.
  • Customization
    Users have extensive control over the configuration of the emulated machine, including CPU type, amount of RAM, and various peripherals.

Possible disadvantages of PCem

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up PCem can be complex, especially for users not familiar with configuring legacy PC hardware and software.
  • Resource Intensive
    PCem can be resource-intensive compared to other emulators, requiring a relatively powerful modern PC to run smoothly.
  • Limited Graphics Support
    While it supports many early graphics cards, PCem lacks support for more advanced graphics emulation beyond older Voodoo models.
  • Requires BIOS
    PCem requires the user to provide their own BIOS files for the emulated systems, which can be difficult to legally obtain.

CSS Scan Pro videos

Editing Nomadlist with CSS Scan Pro Visual Editor (Test)

PCem videos

Installation and Review of Windows NT 3.1 Build 297 (PCem)

More videos:

  • Review - Emulating Windows 98 (D3D, 3Dfx) on PCEM running 3DMark'99 Full Speed On A Windows 10 PC
  • Demo - Blood II PC Gamer Demo (PCEM Test)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Scan Pro and PCem)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Scan Pro and PCem. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PCem seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan Pro. While we know about 34 links to PCem, we've tracked only 2 mentions of CSS Scan Pro. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Scan Pro mentions (2)

  • Super Useful Chrome Plugins for Front-End Developers
    CSS Scan and CSS Pro are two of the best chrome extensions for front-end developers I know of. https://getcssscan.com/ https://csspro.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Has anyone used cssscan?
    I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: over 2 years ago

PCem mentions (34)

  • Popularity of DOS/4GW made Win95 game compat easier, but with higher stakes
    Absolutely check out PCem for a closer to hardware emulation than dosbox, https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Anyone get Sid Meier's SimGolf Working?
    One option is to try PCEm https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ which is a emulator for old computers that runs on Windows and Linux, I actually learned about it via this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9HP9W88Wew of a guy playing Sim Golf on his Windows PC using PCEm, this should be similar on Linux but I'm not sure if the SteamDeck will have enough power but maybe worth a try. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is there anyway to port old abandonware Windows 95/98 game to Apple Silicon?
    For hardcore mode, compile PCEm - I think brew has most of the dependencies available ... https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ - have fun! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is VirtualBox still really bad with Windows 9x?
    You use 86box or PCem which are not virtualizers but hardware emulators so you will need a really fast CPU (especially in single thread). The advantage is that Windows 98 will be running on period appropriate hardware, since all of it is being emulated real-time. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
    QEMU [0] emulates many systems, including the 32-bit Intel architecture. For retro gaming specifically I can recommend PCem [1], which also emulates a wide range of sound and graphics cards, from IBM MDA to 3dfx Voodoo 2. [0] https://www.qemu.org/ [1] https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Scan Pro and PCem, you can also consider the following products

CSS Scan - Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

86Box - 86Box is a hypervisor and IBM PC system emulator that specializes in running old operating systems...

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.