Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CSS Scan Pro VS Enzyme

Compare CSS Scan Pro VS Enzyme and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CSS Scan Pro logo CSS Scan Pro

The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

Enzyme logo Enzyme

Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.
  • CSS Scan Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Enzyme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

CSS Scan Pro features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    CSS Scan Pro offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Time-saving
    It allows users to quickly inspect and copy CSS, significantly speeding up the workflow and reducing development time.
  • Accurate CSS Extraction
    The tool provides precise CSS extraction, ensuring that you get exactly the styles applied to an element without any unnecessary code.
  • Live Preview
    CSS Scan Pro features a live preview function that lets users see changes in real-time, helping in faster decision-making and better design accuracy.
  • Cross-browser Support
    It supports all major browsers, allowing for consistent CSS extraction and design across different environments.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize the settings to meet their specific needs, such as changing the format of the copied CSS code.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Scan Pro

  • Price
    CSS Scan Pro is a premium tool, and its cost might be prohibitive for some individuals or small teams who are on a tight budget.
  • Browser Extension Requirement
    It requires installation as a browser extension, which might be a barrier for users who are restricted from installing extensions due to organizational policies.
  • Limited to CSS
    While excellent for CSS, it doesn't offer functionalities for other development aspects like JavaScript or HTML, limiting its all-in-one utility.
  • Learning Curve
    Though generally user-friendly, there might be a slight learning curve for absolute beginners unfamiliar with browser extensions or CSS tools.

Enzyme features and specs

  • Shallow Rendering
    Allows you to render a component without its children, which speeds up tests and isolates the component being tested.
  • Rich API
    Provides a comprehensive set of APIs that enable deep rendering, traversing, and manipulating of components, making it flexible and powerful for various testing needs.
  • Compatibility with Mocha and Jest
    Easily integrates with popular testing frameworks like Mocha and Jest, ensuring a smooth setup process.
  • Simulate Events
    Supports simulation of user events such as clicks, enabling more realistic interaction testing.
  • Selector Support
    Allows for selecting and finding elements using CSS selectors or component constructors, making it easier to target specific elements in tests.
  • Active Community
    Has a large and active community, which can be a valuable resource for support, plugins, and best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Enzyme

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for beginners, requiring additional libraries and configurations.
  • Limited Support for New React Features
    Often lags behind in supporting new React features, such as Hooks or the latest Context API, compared to other testing frameworks.
  • Deprecation Warnings
    Issues with deprecation warnings and updates can arise, causing frustrations during maintenance and upgrades.
  • Performance Overhead
    Can be slower compared to other testing libraries, especially when using deep rendering for large components.
  • Inconsistent API
    Some users find the API inconsistent or unintuitive, requiring more effort to learn and use effectively.

Analysis of CSS Scan Pro

Overall verdict

  • CSS Scan Pro is generally well-received by developers and designers who need a reliable solution for quick CSS inspections and edits. It is considered a worthy investment for those looking to enhance their workflow efficiency, especially in the front-end development space.

Why this product is good

  • CSS Scan Pro is considered a valuable tool primarily due to its efficiency in streamlining the design process. It allows users to inspect, copy, and edit the CSS of any website effortlessly. The tool is known for its user-friendly interface, speed, and the ability to acquire accurate CSS code quickly. Users often praise its capability to boost productivity by eliminating the need for manual coding inspection and simplifying design adjustments.

Recommended for

    CSS Scan Pro is recommended for web designers, front-end developers, and anyone involved in UI/UX design who frequently works with CSS and seeks to streamline their process. It's especially useful for professionals who need to replicate styles from existing websites or who want to optimize their CSS workflow.

Analysis of Enzyme

Overall verdict

  • Enzyme is generally considered a good tool for testing React applications, especially among developers familiar with its API. However, it is worth noting that there has been a shift towards using React Testing Library, which has gained popularity for its focus on testing the application as users would interact with it.

Why this product is good

  • Enzyme is a popular JavaScript testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output. It provides methods for rendering components, interacting with them, and testing their lifecycle methods, which are essential for writing comprehensive tests for your React applications.

Recommended for

    Enzyme is recommended for developers who are working on React applications and prefer a testing library that provides a more detailed inspection of component internals, or for those maintaining legacy codebases that already rely on Enzyme. If you value testing that emphasizes implementation details, Enzyme can be a good choice.

CSS Scan Pro videos

+ Add

Editing Nomadlist with CSS Scan Pro Visual Editor (Test)

Enzyme videos

+ Add

Enzymes (Updated)

More videos:

  • Review - Enzymes
  • Review - Over-the-Counter Enzyme Supplements Explained: Mayo Clinic Physician Explains Pros, Cons

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Scan Pro and Enzyme)

CSS Scan Pro

Enzyme

Developer Tools
68 68%
Developer Tools
32% 32
Design Tools
75 75%
Design Tools
25% 25
Development
62 62%
Development
38% 38
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Scan Pro and Enzyme. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Enzyme should be more popular than CSS Scan Pro. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Scan Pro mentions (2)

  • Super Useful Chrome Plugins for Front-End Developers
    CSS Scan and CSS Pro are two of the best chrome extensions for front-end developers I know of. https://getcssscan.com/ https://csspro.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Has anyone used cssscan?
    I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 3 years ago

Enzyme mentions (3)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Enzyme is a widely-used testing utility that provides robust tools for interacting with and inspecting React components. Its API supports shallow, full, and static rendering, enabling developers to test components in isolation or with their child components. Enzyme also allows testing lifecycle methods, making it ideal for applications with complex state and props interactions. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How we have managed to run Enzyme tests with React 18 app.
    Like many other companies with mature software, we found ourselves at a crossroads with our React application. The app, initially developed in early 2019, was built with React 16 and used Enzyme for unit testing. Over the past five years, the app grew, evolved, gained new features, and went though minor and major refactorings. Obviously, as responsible engineers we always maintained unit test coverage around... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • What would you consider to be a must for a modern 2022 dev stack?
    React testing library instead of enzyme for testing react UIs. I'll never go back. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Scan Pro and Enzyme, you can also consider the following products

CSS Scan - Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

Ava - Making conversations accessible for the deaf

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

react-testing-library - [`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

EyeJS - A JavaScript testing framework for the real world.

Loading...