Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Modules. While we know about 467 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 11 mentions of CSS Modules. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
From what I read about CSS modules, the style isolation provides some guard rails to prevent things like random bits of global style or having colliding rules all over the place. This makes a lot of sense, but even on huge projects, I never really have those problems. I've disciplined myself to pair a component file with a CSS file (MyComponent.jsx + MyComponent.css) and keep global styles to a minimum. Source: over 1 year ago
Any time you import CSS files into a module, that CSS becomes active on EVERY component in your entire project, so that's not really a good way to go about it. It essentially creates a tag inside the final rendered html with all of your CSS within it. If you have two CSS files, and they both have a class of .myClass
then they will step on each other and cause bad things to happen to your...
Source:
over 1 year ago
They are probably using css modules. Source: over 1 year ago
This may be a little more advanced but I'd also recommend looking into CSS modules. It basically allows you to scope your styles to individual elements preventing unwanted cascading, and simplifies naming conventions a lot (since the class names are now variables). Source: over 1 year ago
Another interesting way to organize you css is using css modules. Source: about 2 years ago
You can deploy to Github Pages in under 2 minutes by following their documentation. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
styled-components - styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket