Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CSS Dig VS Trix

Compare CSS Dig VS Trix and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CSS Dig logo CSS Dig

CSS Dig is a Cascading Style Sheet viewer extension that allows you to collect and style the website element properties.

Trix logo Trix

A rich text editor for everyday writing.
  • CSS Dig Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-07
  • Trix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-01

CSS Dig features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    CSS Dig provides a detailed analysis of your stylesheets, helping identify repeated styles and offering insights for optimization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool features an intuitive interface that makes it accessible for both beginner and advanced users.
  • Browser Extension
    CSS Dig is available as a browser extension, making it easy to use directly in the development environment.
  • Saves Time
    Automates the process of auditing and refining CSS code, significantly reducing the time required for manual analysis.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Dig

  • Limited to CSS
    The tool is focused solely on CSS files and does not offer functionality for other styles or scripts.
  • Dependency on Extensions
    It requires browser extensions for full functionality, which might not be feasible in all development environments or workflows.
  • Learning Curve
    While generally user-friendly, new users might experience a learning curve in understanding all features and readings provided by the tool.
  • Potential Performance Impact
    Running the extension in a browser might impact its performance, especially when dealing with very large stylesheets.

Trix features and specs

  • User-friendly interface
    Trix offers a simple and clean interface that is easy to navigate for users of various skill levels, making it an accessible tool for content creation.
  • Rich text features
    The editor supports a variety of formatting options, including bold, italic, lists, links, and embedded content, providing flexibility in how text and media are presented.
  • Embedded multimedia
    Users can seamlessly insert images, videos, and other multimedia content directly into the text, enhancing the overall interactivity and engagement of the content.
  • Cross-browser compatibility
    Trix is designed to work consistently across different browsers, ensuring that the editing experience is uniform and reliable no matter what browser is being used.
  • Simplicity in integration
    Integrating Trix into web applications is straightforward with minimal configuration, reducing the time and effort required for setup.
  • Open-source
    As an open-source project, Trix allows developers to contribute to its improvement and adapt the software to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Trix

  • Limited customization
    While Trix is straightforward to use, it offers fewer customization options compared to other rich text editors, which may limit its adaptability for certain advanced use cases.
  • Basic feature set
    Some users might find Trix lacking in advanced features such as collaborative editing, markdown support, or real-time spell checking, which are available in other editors.
  • Dependency on server for processing
    Trix relies on server-side processing for embedding and saving data, which might increase complexity in terms of server configuration and handling.
  • Incomplete documentation
    While there is a documentation available, it may not cover all aspects or use cases in detail, potentially causing difficulties for developers during implementation.
  • Performance with large documents
    Trix can sometimes struggle with performance issues when handling very large documents, affecting the user experience during editing sessions.

CSS Dig videos

No CSS Dig videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Trix videos

+ Add

Trix has Fruity Shapes, AGAIN!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Trix VS Trix
  • Review - Trix Trux Review: Does it Work? | As Seen on TV

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Dig and Trix)

CSS Dig

Trix

Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
Rich Text Editor
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Dig and Trix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CSS Dig and Trix

CSS Dig Reviews

We have no reviews of CSS Dig yet.
Be the first one to post

Trix Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
If you want something different for a change, with the basic functionalities of a web editor, Trix can be a pick. The project describes that it is built for the modern web.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Trix seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Dig mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS Dig yet. Tracking of CSS Dig recommendations started around Sep 2021.

Trix mentions (14)

  • Word-like HTML inline edit with design mode
    I love how Trix [0] and (I think) ProseMirror [1] work in that regard: it does use contenteditable, but every edit you make is applied to an internal model instead, then the editor state is updated back from the model. [0]: https://trix-editor.org/ [1]: https://prosemirror.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Testing ViewComponent w/ Capybara
    💡 If you're using the Trix editor, I also show you how to test your view components with a nice helper inspired by Will Olson's article Testing the Trix Editor with Capybara and MiniTest. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Quill – Your powerful rich text editor
    Trix is simple and easy to use for basic writing like a blog. It’s what Basecamp and HEY both use (it was built by 37signals and is the default in Rails) https://trix-editor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • WYSIWYG editor for a new Rails project
    Trix was the winner. It was easy to style, is well maintained, has documentation for embedding it into a form, is easy to create custom keyboard shortcuts for, has great examples on how to save/load content or modify it with javascript. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How to use Cloudflare R2 with Ruby on Rails Active Storage
    In some case, you may need to allow the user to upload the file in the text editor like Trix editor. However, you current configuration not allowed it, you need to configure the CORS. Here the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Dig and Trix, you can also consider the following products

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer

Cleartext - A text editor that allows only the 1,000 most common words

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

User CSS - User CSS is a browser extension that allows you to inspect style sheets from websites.

MediumEditor - MediumEditor is a simple inline editor toolbar built with JavaScript.

Loading...