Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS Unused CSS

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Unused CSS and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Unused CSS logo Unused CSS

Easily find and remove unused CSS rules
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Unused CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-13

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Unused CSS features and specs

  • Performance Optimization
    Removing unused CSS can lead to faster page load times, improving user experience and potentially boosting SEO rankings.
  • Reduced File Size
    By eliminating unused CSS, the overall file size of stylesheets is reduced, which can decrease bandwidth usage and server load.
  • Improved Maintainability
    Cleaned-up CSS makes it easier for developers to read and maintain the stylesheet, reducing the complexity of future updates.
  • Fewer Rendering Issues
    By having only the necessary CSS, the likelihood of rendering issues and style conflicts is minimized, ensuring a more consistent design across different browsers and devices.

Possible disadvantages of Unused CSS

  • Potential Over-removal
    There is a risk of mistakenly removing CSS that is conditionally used (e.g., dynamic content or styled via JavaScript), which can lead to broken styles on the website.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Setting up tools to analyze and trim unused CSS can be complex, requiring time and technical expertise to configure properly.
  • Regular Maintenance
    Web applications that frequently change or add new content may require ongoing checks to ensure CSS remains optimal, which could increase maintenance efforts.
  • Risk of False Positives
    Automated tools might misidentify CSS as 'unused' if they're used in specific contexts not covered during the analysis phase, potentially leading to functionality issues.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Unused CSS videos

+ Add

UnCSS your CSS! Removing Unused CSS with PostCSS & Parcel

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to Remove Unused CSS code from Joomla Web Pages - 👀 WMW 109

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Unused CSS)

CrossBrowserTesting

Unused CSS

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Unused CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than Unused CSS. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

Unused CSS mentions (1)

  • Top 15 Tools for Frontend Developers: Optimize Your Workflow
    Easily clean up your unused CSS rules with UnusedCSS. This tool scans your stylesheets and identifies CSS rules that are not being used in your project. By removing these unused rules, you can reduce the size of your CSS files, improving load times and overall performance. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Unused CSS, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Purgecss - Easily remove unused CSS

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Loading...