Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS ESLint

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS ESLint and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

ESLint logo ESLint

The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • ESLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-14

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

ESLint features and specs

  • Customization
    ESLint is highly customizable through configuration files, allowing developers to tailor the linting process to fit their specific coding standards and project requirements.
  • Extensibility
    With a wide range of plugins and the ability to write custom rules, ESLint can be extended to accommodate unique project needs or additional languages and frameworks.
  • Community Support
    ESLint has a large and active community, ensuring continuous improvement, frequent updates, and a wealth of shared knowledge and resources.
  • Integrations
    ESLint integrates seamlessly with most development environments, build tools, and version control systems, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Error Prevention
    By statically analyzing code to catch potential errors and bad practices before runtime, ESLint helps improve code quality and reduce bugs.
  • Consistency
    Applying ESLint across a project ensures coding standards are maintained consistently, which is particularly beneficial for teams with multiple developers.

Possible disadvantages of ESLint

  • Initial Setup
    Configuring ESLint for the first time can be daunting, especially for those who are new to the tool or have complex project requirements.
  • Performance
    On large codebases, ESLint can sometimes slow down builds or editor performance due to the extensive analysis it performs.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a learning curve associated with understanding and configuring ESLint rules, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • Strictness
    Depending on the configuration, ESLint can be very strict, leading to a large number of warnings or errors that may initially overwhelm developers not accustomed to such rigorous linting.
  • Opinionated Rules
    Some ESLint default rules may not align with every developer's or team's coding style preferences, necessitating further customization and adjustment.
  • Maintenance
    Keeping ESLint configurations and plugins up to date requires ongoing maintenance, especially as projects evolve and dependencies change.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

ESLint videos

ESLint Quickstart - find errors automatically

More videos:

  • Review - ESLint + Prettier + VS Code — The Perfect Setup
  • Review - Linting and Formatting JavaScript with ESLint in Visual Studio Code

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and ESLint)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and ESLint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CrossBrowserTesting and ESLint

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

ESLint Reviews

8 Best Static Code Analysis Tools For 2024
You can use ESLint through a supported IDE such as VS Code, Eclipse, and IntelliJ IDEA or integrate it with your CI pipelines. Moreover, you can install it locally using a package manager like npm, yarn, npx, etc.
Source: www.qodo.ai

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ESLint seems to be a lot more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. While we know about 267 links to ESLint, we've tracked only 6 mentions of CrossBrowserTesting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

ESLint mentions (267)

  • Never lose valuable error context in JavaScript
    While ESLint is the go-to tool for code quality in JavaScript, it doesn’t provide any built-in rule for this. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • Shopify: Getting to grips with GraphQL
    This linting is designed to work with eslint, which is very commonly used in the JavaScript world. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Most Effective Approaches for Debugging Applications
    Static code analysis tools scan code for potential issues before execution, catching bugs like null pointer dereferences or race conditions early. Daniel Vasilevski, Director and Owner of Bright Force Electrical, shares, “Utilizing static code analysis tools gives us a clear look at what’s going wrong before anything ever runs.” During a scheduling system rebuild, SonarQube flagged a concurrency flaw, preventing... - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Static Code Analysis: Ensuring Code Quality Before Execution
    ESLint – Widely used for JavaScript/TypeScript projects to catch style and logic errors. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 🚀 Biome Has Entered the Chat: A New Tool to Replace ESLint and Prettier
    If you’ve ever set up a JavaScript or TypeScript project, chances are you've spent way too much time configuring ESLint, Prettier, and their dozens of plugins. We’ve all been there — fiddling with .eslintrc, fighting with formatting conflicts, and installing what feels like half the npm registry just to get decent code quality tooling. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and ESLint, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.