Creative Commons VS MIT License

First, when I say open project, I mean, any project released under a license like GPL, any Open Source license, or a Creative Commons license. Not every project involves software development. There are projects that are related to the creation of multimedia content, like images, text, audio or video, and if you want that anyone has access, can redistribute the material or create derivative work, as it happens with... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

You can also look for assets under Creative Commons licenses (though you'll need to research the licenses as some require attribution or don't allow use in anything commercial or etc). Source: 5 months ago

You'll need to pick a specific license, not just generic open source. For this kind of thing, the usual recommendation is a creative commons liscence. They have a handy little tool to help you figure out which license is best for you. Source: 10 months ago

Regardless, there's a broader "free culture" movement with things like the Creative Commons licenses, etc facilitating a similar approach to other kinds of IP, like movies, music, etc. There are special open source licenses tailored to fonts and a whole ecosystem of open source fonts, for example. Source: 12 months ago

This is the entire reason the Creative Commons project exists: Copyright law is extremely strict, and CC licenses provide artists with an easy way to be more permissive with the rights to their works, while still being selective about what rights they retain, and while still remaining compliant with copyright law.... Source: 12 months ago

Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 10 months ago