Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cppcheck VS TSLint

Compare Cppcheck VS TSLint and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Cppcheck logo Cppcheck

Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

TSLint logo TSLint

An extensible static analysis linter for the TypeScript language
  • Cppcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • TSLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Cppcheck features and specs

  • Open Source
    Cppcheck is open-source software, which means it is free to use and its source code is available for modification and distribution under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
  • Static Analysis
    Cppcheck excels at performing static code analysis, detecting bugs, memory leaks, and potential issues in C and C++ code without executing the program.
  • Wide Platform Support
    Cppcheck supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile and accessible to developers on different operating systems.
  • Integrated with IDEs
    Cppcheck can be integrated with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Visual Studio, Eclipse, and Code::Blocks, providing seamless code analysis during development.
  • Customizable
    Cppcheck allows customization of its analysis through command-line options and configurations, enabling users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and project requirements.
  • Extensive Reporting
    Cppcheck provides detailed reports that highlight various types of issues, making it easier for developers to identify and resolve problems efficiently.
  • Regular Updates
    Cppcheck is actively maintained, with regular updates and improvements that enhance its capabilities and address any newly discovered issues.

Possible disadvantages of Cppcheck

  • False Positives
    Cppcheck may sometimes produce false positives, flagging issues that are not actually problematic, which can lead to unnecessary debugging efforts.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may encounter a learning curve when first using Cppcheck, as they need to understand its configuration options and how to interpret its output effectively.
  • Limited Dynamic Analysis
    Cppcheck focuses on static analysis and does not provide dynamic analysis capabilities, which means it cannot detect issues that only occur at runtime.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Cppcheck on large codebases can introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development process if not managed properly.
  • Complex Configuration
    For complex projects, configuring Cppcheck to ignore certain false positives or to focus on specific types of issues can be challenging and time-consuming.

TSLint features and specs

  • TypeScript Support
    TSLint is specifically designed for TypeScript, allowing developers to enforce coding standards and catch errors in TypeScript code more effectively than generic linters.
  • Customizability
    TSLint offers a highly customizable rule set, enabling developers to tailor the linter to meet the specific stylistic and technical requirements of their projects.
  • Community Rules
    A wide range of community-created rules and plugins are available, expanding the functionality of TSLint beyond its core rule set.
  • Integration
    TSLint integrates seamlessly with popular editors and build systems, increasing productivity by providing instant feedback during the coding process.

Possible disadvantages of TSLint

  • Deprecation
    TSLint has been deprecated in favor of ESLint with TypeScript support, meaning there will be no further updates or official support, potentially leading to security and compatibility issues over time.
  • Performance
    Compared to ESLint, TSLint might be less performant, especially in large projects, due to its older architecture.
  • Limited Future Features
    With the move to ESLint, TSLint will not benefit from future enhancements and innovations in the linting community, limiting its growth potential relative to ESLint.
  • Complex Migration Path
    Projects that have extensive TSLint rules will need to migrate to ESLint, which can be complex and time-consuming due to differences in rule configuration and behavior.

Analysis of Cppcheck

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Cppcheck is generally considered a good tool for developers and teams working with C/C++ codebases. It provides valuable insights into code quality and potential issues that could lead to bugs. Its configurability and active community support further enhance its usefulness in a development environment.

Why this product is good

  • Cppcheck is a static analysis tool for C/C++ code that helps identify bugs, undefined behavior, and non-compliance with coding standards. It is widely appreciated for its ability to catch a variety of issues during the development phase without executing the code. The tool is open source, actively maintained, and has a wide array of checks that can be configured to suit different project requirements.

Recommended for

    Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.

Cppcheck videos

+ Add

Cppcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Daniel Marjamäki: Cppcheck, static code analysis

TSLint videos

+ Add

Tslint.json and fixing code Quality || Angular 8 [MOST TRICKY INTERVIEW CONCEPT]

More videos:

  • Review - Migrating from TSLint to ESLint is a pain | Problems and Solutions
  • Review - Good TSLint Rules | Seattle TypeScript | 6/26/19

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cppcheck and TSLint)

Cppcheck

TSLint

Code Analysis
86 86%
Code Analysis
14% 14
Code Coverage
80 80%
Code Coverage
20% 20
Code Review
80 80%
Code Review
20% 20
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cppcheck and TSLint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cppcheck and TSLint

Cppcheck Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Cppcheck is a popular, open-source, free, cross-platform static code analysis tool dedicated to C and C++. It is known for being easy to use and its simplicity is one of its pros. To get started with it you don’t have to do any adjustments or modifications, which is why it’s often recommended for beginners. It also has a reputation of reporting a relatively small number of...
Source: www.incredibuild.com

TSLint Reviews

We have no reviews of TSLint yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cppcheck mentions (10)

  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Static Code analysis
    For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?
    Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types
    Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

TSLint mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TSLint yet. Tracking of TSLint recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cppcheck and TSLint, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

Loading...