Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Control-M VS Sidekiq

Compare Control-M VS Sidekiq and see what are their differences

Docubee
Intelligent Contract Automation featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Sidekiq logo Sidekiq

Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Sidekiq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-28

Control-M videos

+ Add

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Sidekiq videos

+ Add

Sidekiq Review: Influencer Marketing Software (Platform)

More videos:

  • Review - Mike Perham, Creator of Sidekiq
  • Review - RailsConf 2015 - Processes and Threads - Resque vs. Sidekiq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Sidekiq)

Control-M

Sidekiq

IT Automation
100 100%
IT Automation
0% 0
Ruby On Rails
0 0%
Ruby On Rails
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Sidekiq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Sidekiq

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Sidekiq Reviews

We have no reviews of Sidekiq yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sidekiq seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sidekiq mentions (21)

  • Hanami and HTMX - progress bar
    Hi there! I want to show off a little feature I made using hanami, htmx and a little bit of redis + sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • 3 one-person million dollar online businesses
    Sidekiq https://sidekiq.org/: This one started as an open source project, once it got enough traction, the developer made a premium version of it, and makes money by selling licenses to businesses. Source: 6 months ago
  • We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
    > I'm not sure feature withholding has traditionally worked out well in the developer space. I think it's worked out well for Sidekiq (https://sidekiq.org). I really like their model of layering valuable features between the OSS / Pro / Enterprise licenses. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Organize Business Logic in Your Ruby on Rails Application
    The code above isn't idempotent. If you run it twice, it will create two copies, which is probably not what you intended. Why is this important? Because most backend job processors like Sidekiq don't make any guarantees that your jobs will run exactly once. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • An M1 for Curl
    Relevant Patio11 comment from 2016: > We don't donate to OSS software which we use, because we're legally not allowed to. > I routinely send key projects, particularly smaller projects, a request to quote me a commercial license of their project, with the explanation that I would accept a quote of $1,000 and that the commercial license can be their existing OSS license plus an invoice. My books suggest we've spent... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Sidekiq, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job

Loading...