Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Control-M VS delayed_job

Compare Control-M VS delayed_job and see what are their differences

LaunchBrightly
Automatically generate screenshots reflecting the latest version of your product and eliminate the manual burden of updating product screenshots in your help center. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

delayed_job logo delayed_job

Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • delayed_job Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02

Control-M videos

+ Add

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

delayed_job videos

No delayed_job videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and delayed_job)

Control-M

delayed_job

IT Automation
100 100%
IT Automation
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and delayed_job. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and delayed_job

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

delayed_job Reviews

We have no reviews of delayed_job yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, delayed_job seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

delayed_job mentions (4)

  • How to run a really long task from a Rails web request
    So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Delayed Job vs. Sidekiq: Which Is Better?
    Several gems support job queues and background processing in the Rails world — Delayed Job and Sidekiq being the two most popular ones. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Why does rails have a tradition of queuing background jobs in a separate NoSQL store, when both the queueing controller and the job class tend to hammer the main database anyway?
    Back in the day, before Sidekiq and such, we used Delayed Job https://github.com/collectiveidea/delayed_job. Source: over 2 years ago
  • A quick look at background jobs in Ruby
    There are a few of popular systems. A few need a database, such as Delayed::Job, while others prefer Redis, such as Resque and Sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and delayed_job, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

Loading...