Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS Cerberus FTP Server

Compare Control-M VS Cerberus FTP Server and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Cerberus FTP Server logo Cerberus FTP Server

Cerberus FTP Server Enterprise is a professional FTP server that supports encrypted FTPS and SFTP sessions as well as HTTP and HTTPS file...
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Cerberus FTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Cerberus FTP Server videos

Introduction: Cerberus FTP Server HTTPS Web Client

More videos:

  • Review - Cerberus FTP Server - Transform the Way You Transfer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Cerberus FTP Server)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
FTP Client
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Cerberus FTP Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Cerberus FTP Server

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Cerberus FTP Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Cerberus FTP Server yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Cerberus FTP Server, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

AWS Transfer for SFTP - AWS Transfer for SFTP (AWS SFTP), is a fully managed service hosted in AWS that enables transfer of files over the Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol directly in and out of Amazon S3.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

CompleteFTP by EnterpriseDT - CompleteFTP is a secure FTPS and SFTP server for Windows.