Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS AWS Transfer for SFTP

Compare Control-M VS AWS Transfer for SFTP and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

AWS Transfer for SFTP logo AWS Transfer for SFTP

AWS Transfer for SFTP (AWS SFTP), is a fully managed service hosted in AWS that enables transfer of files over the Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol directly in and out of Amazon S3.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • AWS Transfer for SFTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-08

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

AWS Transfer for SFTP videos

AWS Transfer for SFTP to S3 | Fully Managed SFTP Service | How to set up SFTP to upload files to S3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and AWS Transfer for SFTP)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and AWS Transfer for SFTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and AWS Transfer for SFTP

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

AWS Transfer for SFTP Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS Transfer for SFTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS Transfer for SFTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS Transfer for SFTP mentions (7)

  • What is the easiest way to get Python code running on AWS?
    It is not clear the use case. However, if you want to run a FTP server with capabilities to run python scripts, for example, when files arrive… I recommend evaluate AWS Transfer Family leveraging the managed workflow capabilities. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Event-Driven Serverless Data Architecture
    S3/Transfer - Doesn't matter what you work on, it's hard to get away from file-based transfers and S3 and AWS Transfer are great choices for that. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Is there a preferred SFTP tool in this reddit to receive SFTPs?
    Are you in AWS? They have a managed SFTP service. https://aws.amazon.com/aws-transfer-family/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Upload fortigate gate config directly to s3, possible?
    I bet you could use aws transfer https://aws.amazon.com/aws-transfer-family/. There is a hourly charge so I would setup a small linux server with s3fs but that's me. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Aws internet line
    Are you saying you’re using AWS Transfer Family? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and AWS Transfer for SFTP, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Cerberus FTP Server - Cerberus FTP Server Enterprise is a professional FTP server that supports encrypted FTPS and SFTP sessions as well as HTTP and HTTPS file...

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

GlobalSCAPE Enhanced File Transfer - With operational efficiency in mind, Globalscape’s Enhanced File Transfer™ (EFT™) Enterprise features quick and intuitive setup, advanced automation capabilities, real-time visibility into data transfers, and much more.