Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

containerd VS AppImageKit

Compare containerd VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

containerd logo containerd

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • containerd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-15
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

containerd videos

Deep Dive: containerd - Derek McGowan, Docker & Phil Estes, IBM Cloud

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to containerd and AppImageKit)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
55 55%
45% 45

User comments

Share your experience with using containerd and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare containerd and AppImageKit

containerd Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
containerd is described as “an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability.” An incubating project of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, containerd is available as a daemon for Linux or Windows.

AppImageKit Reviews

We have no reviews of AppImageKit yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

AppImageKit might be a bit more popular than containerd. We know about 52 links to it since March 2021 and only 45 links to containerd. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

containerd mentions (45)

View more

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing containerd and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

rkt - App Container runtime

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.