CommentBox.io VS Jekyll

CommentBox.io Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

CommentBox.io mentions (6)

• Community Response Thread in Rise Course

  Could you embed a web object? Maybe use something like this: https://devilpenakut.medium.com/free-comment-widget-for-websites-and-blogs-574aca4341f (free) or this: https://commentbox.io/ (not free but fairly cheap and more control). Source: about 1 year ago

• [Hobby Scuffles] Week of November 14, 2022

  Ooo, you even added in comment boxes, nice! It's the free Comment Box thing, right? I'm thinking of using that for my own neocities site once I get it started up. Source: over 1 year ago

• Is there a chat or commenting option I can put on a page that doesn't require another login?

  You can use embed pages from community softwares like Discourse or Flarum or you can use HTML Commentbox or you can just build your own commenting system (it's not that hard). Another option can be Commentbox but it requires external login but only allows third-party auth and has lots of options like Twitter, FB, Google, Github etc. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Is there a way to add a comment section?

  For regular comments (and not like a guestbook/chat or something) I see a lot of people using commentbox https://commentbox.io/. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Launch HN: Typedream (YC W20) – WYSIWYG website builder

  - Not familiar with n8n.io, looks like it's similar to Zapier. We don't have any integration like this yet, but most functional components that you can add to your Typedream site (like forms, waitlist, etc) can be done using HTML embeds. For example, to add a form, you can embed an Airtable form in your Typedream site. This means that any automation supported by those tools can be used. With that said,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Jekyll mentions (180)

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago