collAnon VS The Factual

As in the last thread about projects that didn't make into top HN https://collanon.com remains a free web app for your private discussions and confrontations. ¯ \ _ ( ツ ) _ / ¯. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I tried with my web app https://collanon.com and didn't get much traction on HN(maybe bad timing). It's on its 3rd year of development/improvement and it's about making and sharing easily private discussions and confrontations(1vs1) with temporary/total anonymity in mind without relying on any big tech service or cloud providers to keep the data more private. I'm on a path to a big upgrade soon too. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Here is the webapp itself https://collanon.app meanwhile for info you can look up https://collanon.com. Source: over 1 year ago

There were shy attempts at "marketing" https://collanon.com but I didn't follow through them seriously even though it's a ready to go platform. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I'm still working on collAnon[1], a private discussions platform(behind a PWA) with bias avoiding intent through temporary anonymity of the answers(which also means that discussions have an end date). In the latest development I decided to change route and make it freemium, with all the previous premium features now available to everyone. This is to make it more appealing to try this kind of discussions that are... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago

According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago

We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: over 2 years ago

> Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago