CoffeeScript VS Try It Online (TIO)

JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

As a front-end web developer, do you still use CoffeeScript or jQuery? Unlikely, as TypeScript, ES/TC39 and Babel (and the retirement of Internet Explorer thanks to @codepo8 and his EDGE team) have helped to transform JavaScript into some kind of a modern programming language. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

On the other hand, companies choose React because that's where all the developers are. If you want to build something that can be maintained years from now, you better not choose the next hype train that goes straight to nowhere (remember CoffeeScript ?). You want something battle tested that has stood the test of time, where you won't have trouble finding developers to scale once you need to. And nobody ever got... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Http://coffeescript.org/#expressions this comes from Lisp and makes a lot of things easier. Obviously this was not implemented in ES6 because it would break compatibility and there is also some problems with implicit returns that made the feature a bit weird I wonder if a syntax like this for JS would work: const eldest = if (24>41) { escape "Liz" } else { escape "Ike" } with "escape" working like a mix of "break"... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Coffeescript[1] was a flavour of JS syntax meant to look similar to Ruby syntax. You just compiled it back to JS. It was nice for working on Rails projects since it made everything feel more “cohesive”. I assume this project is here for older Coffeescript[1] projects who want to start using typescript, and need access to interfaces/types that were present in old CS files. [1] https://coffeescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Except that sorts the list in reverse: https://tio.run/##Vc6xDsIwDATQPV9xYyJ5od2Qyo9UGYhIwFXkVlY68PUhKSDEctb5Lbc9y2OVsdZbTAh7CDlacWcDpFXBYIFe5R5tjtLgkLctP2P6U4ATZF48Lu2w/35xNOoy9aBem2ksuwrE5Gk@0UAjDd5sylLsZ1F2rtYX (Also a subtle off-by-one error, it should be 0 to |n|-1 and I to |n|-1.). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

How is this different from Try It Online https://tio.run ? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Given your PL interpreters are written in Python, why not just share them as Python programs, optionally bundled with CPython? Are you concerned abput having a CPython dependency? PLs like Scala or Kotlin or Clojure depend on a backend (JVM, JS), so why not your PL? Or is the issue absolute simplicity? In which case, I suggest aiming at making it available via an online evaluator such as tio.run -- which boils... Source: about 2 years ago

TIO is actually quite good for that, even if it's more commonly associated with code golf. https://tio.run/. Source: over 2 years ago

Try It Online[0] seems to offer a very similar service - if you don't care about the collaboration aspect of it. It claims to be self-hostable[1]. glot.io[2] is another, which seems to fit more in the realm of "pastebin with runnable snippets". As I understand it, a big sell of repl.it is that they have some kind of collaborative editing support, which none of the alternatives I was able to find in a few minutes... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago