Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

codepad VS ST - Simple Terminal

Compare codepad VS ST - Simple Terminal and see what are their differences

codepad logo codepad

Very simple webpage with a simple textbox, a checkbox for selecting one of several languages and an...

ST - Simple Terminal logo ST - Simple Terminal

st is a simple terminal implementation for X.
  • codepad Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • ST - Simple Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-28

codepad features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codepad features a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to quickly test and share code snippets without any setup.
  • Language Support
    Codepad supports multiple programming languages including C, C++, D, Haskell, Lua, OCaml, PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby, Scheme, and Tcl.
  • URL Sharing
    Users can share their code snippets easily with a unique URL, making it convenient for collaboration and code reviews.
  • Instant Execution
    Codepad allows for real-time execution of code, enabling immediate feedback on code performance and correctness.
  • No Account Required
    Users do not need to create an account to use Codepad. They can paste their code and get results instantly.

Possible disadvantages of codepad

  • Limited Features
    Codepad lacks advanced features like debugging tools, syntax highlighting, or integrated development environments (IDE), which might be essential for more complex programming tasks.
  • Privacy Concerns
    All code snippets shared on Codepad are public, which poses privacy concerns for users sharing sensitive or proprietary code.
  • No Version Control
    Codepad does not support version control, which makes tracking changes and collaborating on code more difficult.
  • Limited Language Support
    While Codepad supports several popular programming languages, it may not support newer or less common languages.
  • Performance Limitations
    The platform might struggle with larger code snippets or more complex computations due to its simplicity and lack of optimization features.

ST - Simple Terminal features and specs

  • Lightweight
    ST is designed to be extremely lightweight, making it fast and responsive even on older machines.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    ST aims to minimize dependencies, which simplifies installation and reduces potential for conflicts with other software.
  • Customizability
    ST's source code is intended to be modified by users to fit their needs, allowing deep personalization and optimization.
  • Simplicity
    ST follows the Suckless philosophy of simplicity, providing essential features without unnecessary bloat.
  • Open Source
    ST is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the development of the software.

Possible disadvantages of ST - Simple Terminal

  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalist design, ST lacks some advanced features found in other terminals, which might be essential for certain users.
  • Manual Configuration
    ST requires users to modify its source code for configuration, which can be a barrier for those unfamiliar with programming.
  • Lack of Pre-built Binaries
    ST typically needs to be compiled from source, which can be inconvenient compared to using package managers with pre-built binaries.
  • Basic Look and Feel
    The focus on minimalism means ST does not provide out-of-the-box eye candy or extensive customization of appearance through simple configuration files.
  • Community Size
    ST has a smaller community compared to more popular terminals, potentially making it harder to find support or plugins for additional functionality.

codepad videos

Codepad - Video Review

ST - Simple Terminal videos

No ST - Simple Terminal videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to codepad and ST - Simple Terminal)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Design Playground
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using codepad and ST - Simple Terminal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare codepad and ST - Simple Terminal

codepad Reviews

We have no reviews of codepad yet.
Be the first one to post

ST - Simple Terminal Reviews

The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The st or Simple Terminal emulator gives you precisely what you ask for. ” A simple terminal emulator to interact with your Linux distro.”
Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
Simple Terminal or popularly known as st is an alternative for users who dislike bloated terminal emulators like xterm or rxvt.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ST - Simple Terminal seems to be a lot more popular than codepad. While we know about 47 links to ST - Simple Terminal, we've tracked only 2 mentions of codepad. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

codepad mentions (2)

  • How make my 2nd photo overlap background
    Share your code with http://pastebin.com/ or http://codepad.org/ (or by pasting it here and following the formatting advice in the sidebar). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Python 3 Online Interpreter / Shell [closed]
    As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 9 years ago.Is there an online interpreter like http://codepad.org/... Source: about 3 years ago

ST - Simple Terminal mentions (47)

  • Typing with Pleasure
    Whenever I switch to another dev's machine, usually running either jetbrains or vscode, I'm always astounded at how annoyed I find myself while typing on it due to the high latency on keystrokes. I'm blessed with ~subframe delay using [st](https://st.suckless.org/) and neovim, and now I don't know if I could ever go back to a "true" IDE for professional work. Just for kicks I've started work on my own text editor... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Preview images, videos, fonts, PDFs ... in Vifm.
    The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: Which is the simplest terminal emulator able to run Vim?
    Perhaps st: https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
    > you need to "edit your makefile". That isn't going to work for distributions Is it not? [st] requires exactly that. And distros seem to have no issues shipping it. [st] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Write Your Own Terminal
    Check out st[1] for a minimal terminal implementation. They also have user-submitted patches that you can apply to add desired functionality. [1] https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing codepad and ST - Simple Terminal, you can also consider the following products

Pastebin.com - Pastebin.com is a website where you can store text for a certain period of time.

Kitty terminal - Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

myCompiler - Run your favourite programming languages online

xterm - You can download and use MobaXterm Home Edition for free.

Browxy - Browxy is a web application that serves as an integrated development environment where you can write in coding languages, compile them or edit them.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.