Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeMyUI VS react-testing-library

Compare CodeMyUI VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CodeMyUI logo CodeMyUI

Handpicked code snippets you can use in your web projects

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • CodeMyUI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-20
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

CodeMyUI features and specs

  • High-Quality Demos
    CodeMyUI provides a wide range of high-quality UI/UX design resources and code snippets, which are highly polished and visually appealing.
  • Variety of Components
    The site offers a diverse array of components ranging from buttons, loaders, and navigations to complete page layouts, making it a one-stop resource for developers and designers.
  • Ease of Use
    The website is user-friendly and well-categorized, helping users to quickly find and implement the desired UI components and design inspirations.
  • Regular Updates
    New content is added regularly, ensuring that developers have access to the latest trends and innovative design ideas in UI/UX.
  • Free Resources
    Many of the code snippets and design resources on CodeMyUI are available for free, providing valuable tools for developers without additional cost.

Possible disadvantages of CodeMyUI

  • Limited Interactivity
    While CodeMyUI offers a plethora of static and animated UI components, it lacks interactive elements that require more complex user interactions.
  • Attribution Requirement
    Some of the free resources may require attribution, which could be a limitation for commercial projects that prefer to not include credits.
  • Inconsistency in Code Quality
    Since different contributors add code snippets, there might be inconsistencies in code quality or outdated techniques that users need to watch out for.
  • No Advanced Tutorials
    The website does not provide in-depth tutorials or explanatory content that shows how to integrate these snippets into larger projects, which can be a drawback for beginners.
  • Advertisement Presence
    The website contains advertisements, which might be distracting for users and can affect the overall browsing experience.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of CodeMyUI

Overall verdict

  • CodeMyUI is generally considered a good resource for web designers and developers, especially those looking for high-quality, innovative UI designs. It stands out for its focus on creativity and practical applications, making it a worthwhile bookmark for anyone involved in web design.

Why this product is good

  • CodeMyUI is a resourceful website for designers and developers looking for inspiration and ready-to-use code snippets. It provides a curated collection of creative and unique user interface animations and components that can be directly implemented or customized for web projects. The site is updated regularly with quality content, making it a valuable resource for those in search of new design ideas or looking to enhance their UI with engaging visual elements.

Recommended for

  • Web Designers looking for UI inspiration
  • Developers seeking ready-to-use components
  • Design students exploring creative design ideas
  • UI/UX professionals enhancing their design libraries
  • Freelancers in need of quick solutions for projects

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

CodeMyUI videos

No CodeMyUI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

react-testing-library videos

+ Add

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeMyUI and react-testing-library)

CodeMyUI

react-testing-library

Developer Tools
52 52%
Developer Tools
48% 48
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
Tech
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeMyUI and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be a lot more popular than CodeMyUI. While we know about 133 links to react-testing-library, we've tracked only 4 mentions of CodeMyUI. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeMyUI mentions (4)

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeMyUI and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

30 seconds of code - JS snippets that you can understand in 30 seconds or less.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Codespace - A beautiful cross-platform code snippet manager

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

Snipper.ml - A simple snippet manager in the menubar

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Loading...