Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeMirror VS CSS Scan

Compare CodeMirror VS CSS Scan and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CodeMirror logo CodeMirror

CodeMirror is a versatile text editor implemented in JavaScript for the browser.

CSS Scan logo CSS Scan

Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$
  • CodeMirror Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-19
  • CSS Scan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-14

CodeMirror features and specs

  • Extensible
    CodeMirror is highly customizable with a rich API that allows developers to extend its functionality to meet specific needs. It supports a wide variety of languages and can be adapted to different editing scenarios.
  • Lightweight
    CodeMirror is designed to be efficient and lightweight, suitable for integration into web applications without significantly impacting performance.
  • Wide Language Support
    It offers support for many programming languages out of the box, which makes it versatile for different programming tasks.
  • Active Community
    There is an active community of developers contributing to CodeMirror, which ensures regular updates, improvements, and bug fixes.
  • Embeddable
    CodeMirror can be easily embedded into existing web pages or web applications, enabling developers to provide a rich text editor experience.

Possible disadvantages of CodeMirror

  • Complex Configuration
    While CodeMirror is highly customizable, setting it up and configuring it to fit specific requirements can be complex and sometimes overwhelming for new users.
  • Minimal Default Features
    Out of the box, CodeMirror provides a basic editor without many advanced features, requiring extra configuration and plugins to add functionality like autocompletion or linting.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to CodeMirror, there may be a learning curve involved in understanding its structure and API, especially when creating custom plugins or features.
  • Performance on Large Files
    CodeMirror can experience performance issues when dealing with very large files or extremely complex documents, which may affect its suitability for all projects.
  • Limited Built-in Mobile Support
    CodeMirror’s default interface is not inherently optimized for touch interactions, making it less ideal for mobile or tablet editing without additional customization.

CSS Scan features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CSS Scan offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers of all skill levels to inspect and copy CSS styles directly from the browser.
  • Time-Saving
    It significantly reduces the time needed to debug and replicate styles by allowing quick copying of well-structured CSS rules from any element on the page.
  • Accuracy
    The tool ensures that the copied CSS maintains the exact styling, including computed styles and vendor prefixes, providing high accuracy in replication.
  • Live Edits
    CSS Scan enables live editing of styles, allowing developers to make real-time changes and see the results instantly, which is beneficial for testing and adjustments.
  • Visual Representation
    The extension visually displays how CSS rules are applied, making it easier to understand complex styling hierarchies and cascades.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Scan

  • Cost
    CSS Scan is a paid tool, so there is a financial investment required, which might not be feasible for all developers, especially those working on personal or non-commercial projects.
  • Browser Compatibility
    As a browser extension, its functionality may be limited to supported browsers, potentially excluding users of less common or unsupported browsers.
  • Limited Scope
    While CSS Scan is powerful for copying and analyzing CSS, it does not offer features for editing or managing CSS files directly, requiring another tool or manual intervention for those tasks.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a third-party tool can be a downside if the tool experiences downtime, changes its pricing, or ceases development, leaving users in a difficult position.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Using browser extensions can raise privacy concerns, as they typically have access to the pages you visit; ensuring the trustworthiness of the extension is crucial.

CodeMirror videos

+ Add

How to get value of CodeMirror text editor - step by step guide | CodeMirror #02

More videos:

  • Review - HTMLHint Linter Codemirror Integration

CSS Scan videos

+ Add

Chrome CSS Viewer CSS Scan 2.0 - All Your CSS Secrets Revealed

More videos:

  • Review - CSS Scan and Microthemer are buddies

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeMirror and CSS Scan)

CodeMirror

CSS Scan

Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Developer Tools
6 6%
Developer Tools
94% 94
Rich Text Editor
100 100%
Rich Text Editor
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeMirror and CSS Scan. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeMirror should be more popular than CSS Scan. It has been mentiond 45 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeMirror mentions (45)

  • 25 Project Ideas from Beginner to Advanced with Open Source Contributions
    NOTE: CodeMirror 6 exists, and is more mobile-friendly, more accessible, better designed, and much more actively maintained. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Integrating the ruff language server
    This post covers some background on the Language Server Protocol and then goes into a demonstration of how to integrate the ruff language server into a simple code editor built using CodeMirror. The code for the demonstration is availiable on github. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Adding a Code Editor to your React App
    From the official CodeMirror documentation:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Eloquent JavaScript 4th edition (2024)
    For those that don't know the author, Marijn Haverbeke, is the creator of CodeMirror (code editor) and later ProseMirror (text editor). https://codemirror.net/ https://prosemirror.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Heynote – A Dedicated Scratchpad for Developers
    Performance is mostly handled by CodeMirror (https://codemirror.net/), the underlying editor that Heynote is built upon. It seems to handle quite large buffers well. Where I have seen some minor performance issues is when working with very large blocks in certain language modes. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

CSS Scan mentions (13)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeMirror and CSS Scan, you can also consider the following products

ACE (Ajax Code Editor) - Focused and built towards coders, web designers, and web builders, ACE (Ajax Code Editor) can help...

CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

ProseMirror - A toolkit for building rich-text editors on the web

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

Loading...