Software Alternatives & Reviews

CodeKit VS FLIF

Compare CodeKit VS FLIF and see what are their differences

CodeKit logo CodeKit

CodeKit allows you to optimize the performance of your website by automatically and efficiently compiling a variety of popular languages.

FLIF logo FLIF

Free Lossless Image Format
  • CodeKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-12
  • FLIF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-20

CodeKit videos

CodeKit Basics - How to Setup a Project & Pre Process CSS

More videos:

  • Review - CodeKit Overview
  • Review - CodeKit — GIVEAWAY + Features

FLIF videos

No FLIF videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeKit and FLIF)
Image Optimisation
82 82%
18% 18
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Image Editing
57 57%
43% 43
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeKit and FLIF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FLIF seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeKit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeKit yet. Tracking of CodeKit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FLIF mentions (9)

  • JPEG XL gains support by a billion+ devices
    JXL contains FLIF, one of the most efficient lossless formats. Source: 11 months ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL (~3x smaller than JPEG, HDR, lossless, alpha, progressive, recompression, animations)
    As for lossless image compression, FLIF is based off of a deriviative of CABAC (used by H264) called MANIAC (which I couldn't find any information for). As mentioned on the website in general it outperforms PNG at around 33% smaller files. Interestingly enough, FLIF is a predecessor to JPEG-XL which is what this post is talking about. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL
    I'm a huge fan of AV1 for video, but for images JPEG-XL is simply the better codec than AVIF. If you've not actually looked closely at a comparison and are just on the side of AVIF in this debate because it's based on AV1 (and maybe you hate HEVC / HEIC), I'd urge you to look closer. Jpeg XL is pretty unrelated to Jpeg, Jpeg 2000 and Jpeg XR and instead a successor of Google Guetzli, FLIF and newer research. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    Legally they had no choice because jpeg xl is based on flif.info and https://github.com/google/pik but the flif has LGPL license which should open source the rest.. However regardless the media group didn't really do much other than write some standard and slap their name on it. Wasn't their work. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    No this is a niche format like FLIF was flif.info which got embedded in jpeg xl along with other image technologies. The tech behind QOI and many other things is great, and hopefully the research goes into usage in the future but it won't get mass adoption. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeKit and FLIF, you can also consider the following products

ImageOptim - Faster web pages and apps.

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

OptiPNG - OptiPNG is a command-line PNG optimizer that recompresses image files to a smaller size, without...

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

JPEG Resampler - Jpeg Resampler, nástroj pro konverzi a změnu velikosti obrázků, snadné použití, zdarma

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans