Table of contents
Lossless Compression
FLIF stands for Free Lossless Image Format, and it is designed to provide lossless compression, meaning the image quality remains completely intact without any data loss.
High Compression Ratio
FLIF typically offers better compression ratios compared to other lossless formats like PNG, making the files smaller while retaining quality.
Progressive Loading
FLIF supports progressive rendering, allowing images to be displayed gradually as they are being downloaded, improving user experience by showing previews quickly.
Compatibility with Animated Images
FLIF supports animated images, similar to GIFs, but with better compression efficiency and quality retention.
Versatile Format
FLIF is designed to efficiently compress all kinds of images, including photographs, line art, and animations, offering versatility in its use cases.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if FLIF is good.
Check the traffic stats of FLIF on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of FLIF on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of FLIF's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of FLIF on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about FLIF on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
JXL contains FLIF, one of the most efficient lossless formats. Source: about 2 years ago
As for lossless image compression, FLIF is based off of a deriviative of CABAC (used by H264) called MANIAC (which I couldn't find any information for). As mentioned on the website in general it outperforms PNG at around 33% smaller files. Interestingly enough, FLIF is a predecessor to JPEG-XL which is what this post is talking about. Source: over 2 years ago
I'm a huge fan of AV1 for video, but for images JPEG-XL is simply the better codec than AVIF. If you've not actually looked closely at a comparison and are just on the side of AVIF in this debate because it's based on AV1 (and maybe you hate HEVC / HEIC), I'd urge you to look closer. Jpeg XL is pretty unrelated to Jpeg, Jpeg 2000 and Jpeg XR and instead a successor of Google Guetzli, FLIF and newer research. Source: over 2 years ago
Legally they had no choice because jpeg xl is based on flif.info and https://github.com/google/pik but the flif has LGPL license which should open source the rest.. However regardless the media group didn't really do much other than write some standard and slap their name on it. Wasn't their work. Source: almost 3 years ago
No this is a niche format like FLIF was flif.info which got embedded in jpeg xl along with other image technologies. The tech behind QOI and many other things is great, and hopefully the research goes into usage in the future but it won't get mass adoption. Source: almost 3 years ago
Legacy jpeg has to die if we want to progress. Jpeg XL feature list is like everything in everyone's dreams combined. It's a combination of 3 different projects most notibly FLIF https://flif.info and google's pix format as well as several other ideas. All combined and backed by the joint media group (and cloundinary, google, etc). Source: almost 3 years ago
p.s. Might be worth trying standalone FLIF? Though FLIF is already incorporated into JXL so might just end up with the same result. Source: about 3 years ago
FLIF has been superseded[1] by JPEG XL, which, in my very limited testing, performed better (speed and compression-wise; libjxl) than FLIF. Interesting though that FLIF 0.4 was released 3 days ago. I haven't checked out that new release (and won't), but the previous one wasn't great code and was a pain to use (ended up using its CLI instead of the lib). We ended up going back to PNG because of interoperability and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Can we write FLIF off, or does it still have a chance at wider adoption? I remember quite a positive reaction on release, but don't see it in the wild, unfortunately. https://flif.info/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing FLIF to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is FLIF good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss FLIF here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
