CodeHub VS Pijul
Compare CodeHub VS Pijul and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
CodeHub
Working Copy
hub
Diff So Fancy
GVfs
Git Flow
go-git
PolyGit
Pijul
GitHub Desktop
Mercurial SCM
Bazaar
darcs
Gitless
Git
Fossil
Based on our record, Pijul seems to be a lot more popular than CodeHub. While we know about 42 links to Pijul, we've tracked only 1 mention of CodeHub. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Follow the project on twitter: @CodeHubApp Feature requests can be made on GitHub Additional information can be found on the project's webpage. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
The feature I think I would most like to see is support for patches as a more first-class object. For example reverts and cherry picks have no real metadata. This leads to conflicts when merging branches that have cherry picks (although they often auto-resolve if they are exactly the same diff) and makes asking "Does $branch contain $patch" basically impossible to answer. https://pijul.org/ greatly improves this... - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
In Pijul, conflicts are not modelled as a "failure to merge", but rather as the standard case. Specifically, conflicts happen between two changes, and are solved by one change. The resolution change solves the conflict between the same two changes, no matter if other changes have been made concurrently. Once solved, conflicts never come back. - from https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you will see it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself -- what Pijul users say when they overhear git users arguing with each other about monorepos. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I believe that handling merges like this correctly was a motive for designing pijul: https://pijul.org See the item on the splash page about 'merge correctness'. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find the post detailing the behavior with a bit of searching. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Darcs [0] patch theory was a predecessor to OTs/CRDTs (and a predecessor to git as well; in some ways it is the "smart" to which git was named "dumb"). When it works and performs well it is still sometimes version control magic. Pijul [1] is an interesting experiment to watch, trying to keep the patch theory flag flying and also trying to bring in updates from OTs and CRDTs as it can. [0] https://darcs.net [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
hub - The Hub is a versatile intranet portal and collaboration solution that boosts employee engagement and productivity in a digital workplace.
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
Diff So Fancy - Make Git diffs look good
Bazaar - Bazaar is a tool for helping people collaborate.