Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeFactor.io VS Trunk.io Check

Compare CodeFactor.io VS Trunk.io Check and see what are their differences

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

Trunk.io Check logo Trunk.io Check

Trunk is an all-in-one tool for scalably checking, formatting, and monitoring code.
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19
  • Trunk.io Check Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Trunk.io Check features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Trunk.io Check videos

No Trunk.io Check videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeFactor.io and Trunk.io Check)
Code Coverage
92 92%
8% 8
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Quality
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeFactor.io and Trunk.io Check. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Trunk.io Check seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Trunk.io Check mentions (3)

  • 82% of Open-Source Projects Suffer from Tool Rot
    Unfortunately, the best solution, according to this blog post, is, surprise, surprise, to subscribe to their product (which also encourages devs to embrace brain-dead practices like empty commit messages and squash-merges, which gives me little faith in their product, but I digress). So I guess those of us who can't or won't cough up a subscription fee are just hosed. Source: over 2 years ago
  • An ex-Googler's guide to dev tools
    I would say any styleguide that is in prose form and not machine enforced is deficient. Modern linting and formatting tools are the best, most efficeiect means for enforcing style. No religious arguments are needed if the tooling decides what is correct. Shameless plug for https://trunk.io/products/check - which will handle universal enforcement of all the tooling for all of the pieces of your tech stack. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • 5% of 666 Python repos had comma typo bugs (inc V8, TensorFlow and PyTorch)
    I actually recently joined a startup working on this problem! One of our products is a universal linter, which wraps the standard open-source tools available for the different toolchains, simplifies the setup/installation process for all of them, and a bunch of other usability things (suppressing existing issues so that you can introduce new linters with minimal pain, CI integration, and more): you can read more... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeFactor.io and Trunk.io Check, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

mypy - Mypy is an experimental optional static type checker for Python that aims to combine the benefits of dynamic (or "duck") typing and static typing.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

PyLint - Pylint is a Python source code analyzer which looks for programming errors.

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.