Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeBehind Framework VS Moleculer

Compare CodeBehind Framework VS Moleculer and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CodeBehind Framework logo CodeBehind Framework

CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.

Moleculer logo Moleculer

Fast & modern microservices framework for Node.js.
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (razor syntax)
    Only view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (standard syntax)
    Only view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (razor syntax)
    MVC view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (standard syntax)
    MVC view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC model
    MVC model //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC controller
    MVC controller //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Return template
    Return template //
    2023-12-25

CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports standard syntax and Razor syntax. This framework guarantees the separation of server-side codes from the design part (html) and there is no need to write server-side codes in the view.

Code Behind framework inherits every advantage of ASP.NET Core and gives it more simplicity, power and flexibility.

CodeBehind framework is an alternative to ASP.NET Core.

  • Moleculer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-21

CodeBehind Framework

Website
elanat.net
$ Details
free
Platforms
Windows Linux MacOS
Release Date
2023 January
Edit details

Moleculer

Website
moleculer.services
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

CodeBehind Framework features and specs

  • RAD
    Development is fast with the Code Behind framework.
  • Fast
    The CodeBehind framework is faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
  • Simple
    Developing with CodeBehind is very simple. You can use mvc pattern or model-view or controller-view or only view.
  • Modular
    It is modular. Just copy the new project files, including dll and aspx, into the current active project.
  • Get output
    You can call the output of the aspx page in another aspx page and modify its output.
  • Under .NET Core
    Your project will still be under ASP.NET Core and you will benefit from all the benefits of .NET Core.
  • Code-Behind
    Code-Behind pattern will be fully respected.
  • Modern
    CodeBehind is a modern framework with revolutionary ideas.

Moleculer features and specs

  • Microservices Architecture
    Moleculer provides an efficient microservices framework which allows developers to build robust and scalable distributed systems effortlessly.
  • Out-of-the-Box Features
    Moleculer offers an extensive array of built-in features such as service discovery, load balancing, fault tolerance, and more, reducing the need for third-party integrations.
  • Ease of Use
    Its straightforward API and comprehensive documentation make it easy to learn and implement, even for developers who are new to microservices.
  • Pluggable Transport Layer
    Supports different transporters such as NATS, MQTT, Kafka, and Redis, giving flexibility in how services communicate with each other.
  • Performance
    Designed for high performance, Moleculer can handle a large number of requests efficiently, making it suitable for production-level applications.

Possible disadvantages of Moleculer

  • Complexity in Large Systems
    As with any microservices framework, managing a large number of services can become complex and may require robust monitoring and orchestration tools.
  • Learning Curve
    While Moleculer is easy to start with, mastering it and understanding all its features and best practices may require time.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks, Moleculer may have a smaller community and ecosystem which can affect the availability of third-party plugins or modules.
  • Dependency Management
    Ensuring compatibility between different versions of services and third-party libraries can be challenging, especially when services are updated independently.
  • Debugging and Error Handling
    Distributed systems can be more complex to debug, and although Moleculer provides tools for this, it may still require extra effort compared to monolithic applications.

CodeBehind Framework videos

No CodeBehind Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Moleculer videos

+ Add

MoleculeR review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeBehind Framework and Moleculer)

CodeBehind Framework

Moleculer

Web Frameworks
69 69%
Web Frameworks
31% 31
Developer Tools
58 58%
Developer Tools
42% 42
Python Web Framework
100 100%
Python Web Framework
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
JavaScript Framework
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing CodeBehind Framework and Moleculer.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.

What makes your product unique?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.

What's the story behind your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeBehind Framework and Moleculer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Moleculer should be more popular than CodeBehind Framework. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeBehind Framework mentions (3)

  • ASP.NET Core New BackEnd Framework! CodeBehind 2.5 Released
    CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • How to Load Controller Class From Another DLL?
    As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • CodeBehind 2.1; aspx Back to ASP.NET Core
    CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Moleculer mentions (14)

  • Make microservices look like monoliths
    My goto for this kind of task is moleculer: https://moleculer.services/ Fast, battle tested, vue2-like approach, great documentation, good community. The automatic indipendent-scalability as an option is usually the main selling point of these solutions, but honestly I think the real pro is the "composition" approach, which is essential if you want to keep a clean and well-organized codebase. On this regard, I... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • How to Import/Reference a Microservice from another one
    If you’re using k8s, check out https://moleculer.services and this would likely solve what you’re looking for. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Node JS Microservice Frameworks for Developing Scalable Web Apps.
    Molecular – Progressive Microservices Framework for Node.js. Source: about 2 years ago
  • First time building microservice-based application
    While you’re delving into microservices, check out Moleculer https://moleculer.services. Source: over 2 years ago
  • if Nodejs does not meant for CPU intensive tasks so I think it's better to avoid it from the beginning
    I almost can’t believe I haven’t seen it mentioned here before, but adding Moleculer into your node project (if it’s clustered/k8s’d) will literally solve many single threaded problems, not to mention tons of other scalability issues. https://moleculer.services/. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeBehind Framework and Moleculer, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Nest.js - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications.

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

KintoHub - A modern fullstack app platform

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Loading...