Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

codebeat VS Unused CSS finder

Compare codebeat VS Unused CSS finder and see what are their differences

codebeat logo codebeat

Automated code review for Swift

Unused CSS finder logo Unused CSS finder

Crawl your website and find unused CSS
  • codebeat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-28
  • Unused CSS finder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27

codebeat features and specs

  • Automated Code Review
    Codebeat automates the code review process, providing instant feedback on code quality, which can significantly reduce the time developers spend on manual reviews.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Supports numerous programming languages including Python, Ruby, Java, and JavaScript, making it versatile for teams working on multi-language projects.
  • Integration
    Codebeat offers seamless integration with popular development tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Code Quality Metrics
    Provides comprehensive metrics like code complexity, duplication, and maintainability, helping teams identify and address potential issues early.
  • Team Collaboration
    Facilitates team collaboration by allowing team members to share insights and feedback on code quality directly within the platform.

Possible disadvantages of codebeat

  • Cost
    Pricing could be a concern for smaller teams or individual developers, as it is a paid service after the free trial period.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when first starting with the platform due to its comprehensive set of features and metrics.
  • Dependency Analysis
    While Codebeat provides substantial code quality analysis, it lacks in-depth dependency analysis compared to some other tools.
  • Customization
    Limited customization options for setting up specific rules or adjustments based on project-specific requirements or coding standards.
  • Lag in Updates
    Occasional delays in updates and support for new programming languages or frameworks, which can be a drawback for cutting-edge projects.

Unused CSS finder features and specs

  • Efficiency
    Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
  • Ease of Use
    Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cost Savings
    By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
  • Improved Maintenance
    With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

Possible disadvantages of Unused CSS finder

  • False Positives
    May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
  • Dependency on External Tool
    Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
  • Manual Verification
    Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
  • Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
    Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.

codebeat videos

codebeat - Product Demo

More videos:

  • Review - codebeat is an automated code review tool for the web and mobile
  • Review - codebeat

Unused CSS finder videos

No Unused CSS finder videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to codebeat and Unused CSS finder)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
63 63%
37% 37
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using codebeat and Unused CSS finder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, codebeat seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

codebeat mentions (2)

Unused CSS finder mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Unused CSS finder yet. Tracking of Unused CSS finder recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing codebeat and Unused CSS finder, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Purgecss - Easily remove unused CSS

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer