CMake

Website

cmake.org

$ Details

-

Categories

#Front End Package Manager #JavaScript Package Manager #JS Build Tools #Package Manager

Nest.js

Website

nestjs.com

$ Details

Categories

#Web Frameworks #Developer Tools #JavaScript Framework #Python Web Framework

CMake features and specs

• Cross-platform support
  CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
• Build tool agnostic
  CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
• Large community and extensive documentation
  CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
• Integrated testing support
  CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
• Modular and scalable
  CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

• Steep learning curve
  CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
• Verbose syntax
  CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
• Inconsistent module quality
  The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
• Performance overhead
  CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
• Complexity in advanced features
  Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Nest.js features and specs

• Modular Architecture
  Nest.js uses a modular architecture which is highly organized and maintainable. This allows for better separation of concerns and makes it easier to manage large-scale applications by dividing them into smaller, reusable modules.
• TypeScript Support
  Nest.js is built with TypeScript, providing strong typing and compile-time checks. This leads to fewer runtime errors and improved code readability and maintainability.
• Dependency Injection
  The framework includes a powerful dependency injection system, which enables better testability and easier management of application components.
• Built-in Middleware
  Nest.js supports middleware out of the box, allowing developers to easily add additional request-processing logic at different points in the request lifecycle.
• Extensive Documentation
  Nest.js offers comprehensive and detailed documentation, which helps developers quickly get up to speed and resolve issues more efficiently.
• Scalability
  The framework is designed to be scalable, making it suitable for projects of varying sizes—from small applications to large enterprise-level systems.
• Integration with Modern Libraries
  Nest.js seamlessly integrates with modern libraries and frameworks such as GraphQL, WebSockets, and TypeORM, extending its capabilities and allowing for versatile development options.
• Active Community
  An active and growing community around Nest.js means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and third-party tools available to assist with development.

Possible disadvantages of Nest.js

• Learning Curve
  Due to its rich feature set and use of TypeScript, Nest.js can have a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these technologies.
• Overhead
  The reliance on the decorators and classes can introduce additional overhead, potentially making simple projects more complex than necessary.
• Limited Flexibility
  Nest.js follows an opinionated architecture pattern, which can be restrictive for developers who prefer a more flexible or unstructured approach.
• Performance
  While Nest.js is generally performant, the abstraction layers and TypeScript compile steps can introduce slight performance overhead compared to more lightweight alternatives.
• Dependency on TypeScript
  The heavy reliance on TypeScript can be a drawback for developers who prefer to use plain JavaScript, or who are not familiar with TypeScript.
• Community Compared to Mainstream Frameworks
  Although the Nest.js community is active and growing, it is still smaller compared to more established frameworks like Express.js or Koa, potentially limiting the amount of shared knowledge and third-party packages available.

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

Why I chose Nest.js over Express.js in 2020