Software Alternatives & Reviews

Clozure Common Lisp VS Asana

Compare Clozure Common Lisp VS Asana and see what are their differences

Clozure Common Lisp logo Clozure Common Lisp

Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Asana logo Asana

Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.
  • Clozure Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15
  • Asana Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10

Asana

Website
asana.com
$ Details
freemium $11.99 / Monthly (Per user - Premium)

Clozure Common Lisp videos

No Clozure Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Asana videos

Asana Review + Demo: Top 5 Reasons Asana Is The Best Project and Team Management Tool

More videos:

  • Review - Asana: Full Review (2019) (with timestamps)
  • Review - Asana Warning! Top 5 Reasons To Avoid Asana Project Manager (Before You Buy Asana Review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Clozure Common Lisp and Asana)
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Task Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Clozure Common Lisp and Asana. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Clozure Common Lisp and Asana

Clozure Common Lisp Reviews

We have no reviews of Clozure Common Lisp yet.
Be the first one to post

Asana Reviews

  1. Good, but not the best.

    While Asana is a robust task management and project planning tool, in my experience, it falls slightly short when compared to Trello, particularly in terms of user-friendliness and simplicity. Asana offers a variety of features such as multiple project views (list, board, timeline, calendar), custom fields, and reporting tools, which can be highly beneficial for complex project management. However, I found that the learning curve can be steep, especially for team members not familiar with this type of software. The interface, while feature-rich, can feel a bit cluttered and overwhelming for new users. On the other hand, Trello shines in its simplicity and straightforward design. The visual card and board system is intuitive and easy to grasp, making it a more accessible tool for team members of varying tech proficiency levels. Additionally, Trello's user interface is cleaner and more streamlined, which contributes to an overall more enjoyable user experience.

    In terms of collaboration, both tools provide good collaborative features like commenting, tagging, and task assignment. However, I appreciate Trello's flexibility with its Power-Ups, allowing integration with a wide array of apps which enhances its functionality. In conclusion, while Asana is a powerful tool with extensive features, I prefer Trello for its ease of use, simplicity, and intuitive design. However, I do see the value of Asana for larger teams or more complex projects.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello
  2. A Solid Project Management Tool, but Not the Best on the Market

    Asana is a popular project management tool that has a lot to offer. It is fast and versatile, making it easy for individuals and teams to collaborate and get things done. The interface is clean and user-friendly, and there are plenty of features to help you organise and track your projects.

    However, while Asana is a good tool, it is not the best on the market. One of its main weaknesses is its lack of advanced reporting and analysis capabilities. It can be challenging to get a comprehensive view of your projects and how they are progressing, especially if you have a large number of them.

    Another issue is the cost. Asana can be expensive for teams with a lot of members, especially when compared to other project management tools that offer similar features at a lower price point.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello
    πŸ‘ Pros:    Fast|Clean ui|Excellent features
    πŸ‘Ž Cons:    No reporting|Expensive
  3. Coordinate and manage in teams the tasks and the circulation of work of a plan.

    Asana is a very representative app for the work environment I'm a part of with team members and users it's stellar for: β€’ To manage it on the web and portable devices β€’ With option and manageability on the web β€’ To set up projects and invite team members. β€’ The projects have a roadmap to know the displacement of each activity. β€’ Tasks can contain subtasks to keep track of work β€’ Allows granting tasks, define expiration periods. β€’ Effective and useful for adding files, making comments, and tags.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello, Wrike
    πŸ‘ Pros:    Asana proceeds effectively by promoting and supporting the work plan process for each project in terms of: β€’ to arrange and establish the work to be executed for a given project. β€’ to distribute and share among the members the tasks of a project. β€’ flexible to locate and work those minimum activities of a task. β€’ to fix and assign who will be in charge of the tasks. β€’ it is consistent to fix the structured tasks and visualize the phases and their movements. β€’ to set dates for a project from start to finish. β€’ with the option to handle related tasks that in one way or another are dependent on each other.
    πŸ‘Ž Cons:    Asana, is substantial to give continuity to the acquired commitments, it gathers everything necessary for the satisfactory completion of the work plans, being so it is a fantastic application as long as i have no adverse consequences while i am using it.

The Ultimate List of 20 Best AI Work Management Tools
Asana Intelligence: Asana leverages AI algorithms to provide task recommendations, goal-based resource management, and health checks based on historical data and user behavior, helping users prioritize and manage tasks more efficiently.
Source: ppm.express
12 Best ClickUp Alternatives for Innovative Management in 2023
Benefits of Asana compared to ClickUp: Asana has a simpler layout, which most users love compared to ClickUp. ClickUp lacks visibility of team workload, while Asana has a dedicated feature that gives valuable insights into how projects develop. Asana also lets managers track goals and monitor team performance which is essential for reporting.
Source: ayanza.com
Breeze vs. Asana - The best Asana alternative is Breeze
What is the difference between Breeze and Asana? The main reason to use Breeze instead of Asana is because it is faster, simpler and easier. When using Breeze you can talk to a real person about everything - we listen to your feedback, add features you need, and evolve with our users.
Source: www.breeze.pm
12 BEST Wrike Alternatives for Project Management in 2022
Asana is an ideal project management software for small teams. It is available in three different versions Free, Premium & Enterprise.
Source: www.guru99.com
14 Best Wrike Alternatives For Project Management In 2022
Asana and Wrike are similar in their β€œfreemium” payment model, but differ in some other basic capacities. Wrike has more of a set structure for project management, whereas Asana has greater flexibility, similar to Hive. Project views in Asana include list, boards, timeline and portfolios, whereas Wrike has a Gantt view, timelog view, table view, analytics view, file view,...
Source: hive.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asana seems to be a lot more popular than Clozure Common Lisp. While we know about 86 links to Asana, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Clozure Common Lisp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Clozure Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • The IDEs we had 30 years ago and we lost
    The descendant of CCL runs on modern Intel Macs. (It also runs on Linux and Windows but without the IDE.) The modern IDE is quite a bit different from the original. In particular, it no longer has the interface builder. But it's still pretty good. It is now called Clozure Common Lisp (so the acronym is still CCL) and you can find it here: https://ccl.clozure.com/ If you want to run the original that is a bit... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • The Saga of the Closure Compiler, and Why TypeScript Won
    Just for fun there is also Clozure Common Lisp. https://ccl.clozure.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Consuming HTTP endpoint using Common Lisp
    I have decided it is time to have some fun and use Common Lisp to create algorithm representation that deals with parallel execution. For this I decided to use Clozure common lisp, put basic Qucklisp there and load some libraries to do this. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Corman Lisp development environment for MS Windows
    CCL also supports windows: https://ccl.clozure.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Common Lisp for microservices
    The only thing I've not seen said yet is that Clozure Common Lisp will probably be smaller at runtime than the more common SBCL. The latter has better support, however. Source: almost 2 years ago

Asana mentions (86)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Clozure Common Lisp and Asana, you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Wrike - Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.