Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cirrus CSS VS AgoraPulse

Compare Cirrus CSS VS AgoraPulse and see what are their differences

Cirrus CSS logo Cirrus CSS

The SCSS framework for the modern web. It's component based, customizable, and completely open source.

AgoraPulse logo AgoraPulse

An easy social media management tool that works with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Google+, and YouTube. Start your free trial today!
  • Cirrus CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

Cirrus is a modular, responsive, and component centric SCSS framework aimed at bringing beautiful, hassle-free styling. Cirrus works right away with minimal styling. From there, add components and tweak using utility classes to make it truly your own.

  • AgoraPulse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Cirrus CSS

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
free
Release Date
2022 March

AgoraPulse

$ Details
-
Release Date
2011 January
Startup details
Country
France
City
Paris
Founder(s)
Benoit Hédiard
Employees
50 - 99

Cirrus CSS videos

No Cirrus CSS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

AgoraPulse videos

Agorapulse Review 2019 — Full Walkthrough and Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Agorapulse Review 🔥 The all in one tool for social media management 😍
  • Review - Agorapulse: Manage Social Media Accounts Like a Pro

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cirrus CSS and AgoraPulse)
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Social Media Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Social Media Marketing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cirrus CSS and AgoraPulse.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Cirrus is possible thanks to open source contributors on Dart Sass and True (Sass unit testing framework).

What makes your product unique?

Cirrus CSS's answer

There are often debates on whether component-centric frameworks such as Bootstrap or atomic-classed frameworks such as Tailwind are better for its: - Learning curve - Maintainability - Flexibility - Ease of use

I am a fan of both frameworks as they have their strengths depending on the situation. With component-based frameworks, it is quite easy to slap a couple of different elements together and you have a working website. However, customization may require writing lots of other CSS yourself which takes time away from building your product. Utility-class-based frameworks offer customization that is as granular as it gets short of writing the CSS yourself but without the overhead. A major drawback is that being able to customize and use tree shaking requires direct integration of Tailwind into your project and a CDN version is not feasible for production.

Cirrus is a framework that takes the best parts of both of these types of frameworks and provides: - Many pre-built basic components to accelerate your development velocity (e.g. Avatars, Modals, Tabs, etc.). To keep your code clean, all component classes are built following the BEM convention. - A suite of common utility classes to help tweak and polish your designs when needed. These utility classes are so powerful that you can construct components with them alone. - Different CDN builds of the framework that can be dropped in at any browser (core, ext, all). Choose one that fits your needs.

With the release of 0.7, much of the framework can now be customized. Since the framework is written entirely in SCSS, it can take advantage of all the existing APIs for class generation. The new configuration system in Cirrus allows you to: - Add/Edit/Delete component styles. - Add/Edit/Delete utility classes. - Specify which breakpoints are supported. - Toggle which classes should have viewport variants (to help save on build size). - Enable/Disable different parts of the framework. - And more :)

What's the story behind your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Started in late 2016, Cirrus was built as a side project of mine to foray into web development. Since then it has grown immensely with the addition of components, more utility classes, CSS grid, etc. My main goal for this framework is to make web development as painless as possible -- and that always starts with great documentation and consistency in design choices.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cirrus CSS and AgoraPulse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cirrus CSS and AgoraPulse

Cirrus CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Regarding its extensive suite of components, Cirrus not only provides base styles for page layouts but also a variety of different components. It works immediately with minimal styling. From there, you can add components and customize using utility classes to truly make it your own.
Source: coursesity.com

AgoraPulse Reviews

Agorapulse vs Eclincher: Which Social Media Management Tool Is Better?
Plus, with Agorapulse, you can create custom-designed reports that include specific metrics, timeframes, and data from multiple networks. You can set them up to run automatically at certain times each week or month, and you can even email them directly to your team or your clients. Those reports can also be downloaded as PDFs, CSV files, or PowerPoint presentations which...
Hootsuite vs Sprout Social vs Agorapulse: Which One Will Be Best for Your Social Media Needs?
Also, you won’t have to pay an exorbitant fee for quality customer support from Agorapulse. On Hootsuite, you have to pay $7,200 to receive 4/7 priority support provided by ”real live human support for any issue at any time of day.” (And we know from the above section that this support is substandard.)
Source: iag.me
ContentCal Alternatives: 10 Social Media Solutions That Outshine It
Agorapulse is ideal for social media management teams who are more focused on the analytics/reporting side of content than strictly collaboration and approval. It is also a quite pricey tool, making it a hard sell for up-and-coming outfits.
Source: planable.io
10 PromoRepublic Alternatives for Social Media Managers in 2022
Agorapulse is yet another of the PromoRepublic competitors that can make your brand gain popularity on social media. It provides a simple, user-friendly interface that can be implemented straight away.
6 Hootsuite Alternatives That You Should Explore in 2020
AgoraPulse enables you to manage all your social media posts or messages from one place. It does so by using a social media inbox, which is similar to an email inbox, that can also retain all your old conversations.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cirrus CSS and AgoraPulse, you can also consider the following products

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

HootSuite - Enhance your social media management with Hootsuite, the leading social media dashboard. Manage multiple networks and profiles and measure your campaign results.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

SproutSocial - Sprout Social is a social media management tool created to help businesses find new customers & grow their social media presence. Try it for free.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Buffer - Buffer makes it super easy to share any page you're reading. Keep your Buffer topped up and we automagically share them for you through the day.