CarrierWave VS jQuery File Upload

CarrierWave

Solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks.

jQuery File Upload

File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar, validation and preview images, audio and video for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file up...

Landing page //
2023-10-15

Landing page //
2023-10-22

CarrierWave

Website: github.com
$ Details

Edit details

jQuery File Upload

Website: github.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

CarrierWave features and specs

Flexibility
CarrierWave allows extensive customization of file uploading processes, including the ability to define custom processors, versions, and storage backends, making it highly adaptable to different project requirements.
Integration with Rails
CarrierWave is well-integrated with Ruby on Rails, providing easy-to-use generators and seamless ActiveRecord integration, which simplifies adding file uploads to Rails applications.
Multiple Storage Options
It supports various storage backends like file system, AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and others, enabling developers to choose the best storage option for their application's needs.
Versioning Support
CarrierWave supports creating different versions of uploaded files (e.g., thumbnails for images), which is useful for applications that need various formats or sizes of the original file.

Possible disadvantages of CarrierWave

Learning Curve
New users might find CarrierWave's extensive configuration options overwhelming due to its numerous features and customizations.
Gem Dependencies
CarrierWave may add additional dependencies to a project, which could lead to version conflicts or increased maintenance efforts.
Lack of Built-in Image Processing
CarrierWave relies on other gems, such as MiniMagick or RMagick, for image processing, requiring additional setup and configuration for image manipulation features.
Performance Considerations
The default file storage mechanism may not be suitable for large-scale applications needing high upload volumes, and setting up alternative storage solutions like AWS S3 requires extra configuration.

jQuery File Upload features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CarrierWave videos

+ Add

Recipe App Video 4 - Setting Up Image Uploads using Carrierwave Gem

jQuery File Upload videos

No jQuery File Upload videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CarrierWave and jQuery File Upload)

jQuery File Upload

CDN

78 78%

CDN

22% 22

Digital Asset Management

0 0%

Digital Asset Management

100% 100

File Uploader

100 100%

File Uploader

0% 0

File Uploads

100 100%

File Uploads

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CarrierWave and jQuery File Upload. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CarrierWave seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CarrierWave mentions (2)

Released a Library for Synchronous Execution of Asynchronous Processes in JS/TS
Accel Record is also designed to be similar to Ruby on Rails' Active Record in terms of usability, and one of the things I want to achieve in the future is to create a library like CarrierWave. CarrierWave allows you to save images to external storage services (such as AWS S3) when saving records, and to achieve this with Accel Record, it is necessary to execute asynchronous processes such as image uploads... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Carrier Wave and How to Test Uploading a New Image to a ActiveRecord::Base Model
We’re a Rails shop at Forem. In the Forem code base we use the CarrierWave gem to help with our file uploads. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago