Software Alternatives & Reviews

Carpalx QGMLWB VS Colemak

Compare Carpalx QGMLWB VS Colemak and see what are their differences

Carpalx QGMLWB logo Carpalx QGMLWB

Carpalx is a modifiable keyboard layout system that is based on applying a quantitative model of typing effort. QGMLWB is the fully optimized layout for letters.

Colemak logo Colemak

Colemak is a modern keyboard touch typing layout designed to be a practical improvement on QWERTY and Dvorak layouts.
  • Carpalx QGMLWB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25
  • Colemak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Carpalx QGMLWB videos

No Carpalx QGMLWB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Colemak videos

Switching To Colemak: My Experiences And FAQ

More videos:

  • Review - 5 Years of Colemak - Good choice? My experience
  • Review - Colemak/Custom Keyboard Layout – Is It Worth It?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Carpalx QGMLWB and Colemak)
Keyboards
42 42%
58% 58
Video Presentation
34 34%
66% 66
Office & Productivity
40 40%
60% 60
Monitoring Tools
27 27%
73% 73

User comments

Share your experience with using Carpalx QGMLWB and Colemak. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Colemak should be more popular than Carpalx QGMLWB. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Carpalx QGMLWB mentions (18)

  • Making a Keyboard Layout
    Don’t swap to a new layout, it’s too much work to learn. Instead, swap your K and E keys. E being common but not being in your home row is responsible for a significant chunk of the inefficiency of the QWERTY layout and even if you stop here you’ve already made a huge improvement. You’ll make typos involving K and E for a few days but you’ll adapt very quickly without ever having to go through the “learning a... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How usable is Emacs with its default keybindings?
    Carpalx - keyboard layout optimizer. Source: about 1 year ago
  • GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)
    Is difference in number of keystrokes (keychords) not fairly convincing evidence that, at the very least, vim results in less finger effort (and therefore lower risk of RSI) than other editors? Even if you don't believe that there's a speed advantage (it's entirely plausible that the delay from cognitive processing necessary to navigate vim's more complex interface dwarfs the speed increase of pressing... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • what is the best way to lay out the keyboard keys?
    There is a whole community dedicated to that: http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • An AI designed keyboard layout
    I used the QGMLWY layout by Carpalx[0] for a year or so. The site is really interesting, worth a read. Afaik they made a list of the most common trigrams (three letter combinations) then used a genetic algorithm to optimize the layout for most of the same factors listed in OP's GitHub Readme (minimizing same finger sequences, certain kinds of movement). In the end I switched back to qwerty for 3 reasons: 1.... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Colemak mentions (36)

  • Why the Dvorak keyboard didn't take over the world (2014) [video]
    Anecdotally, I gave Dvorak a try and became somewhat proficient, but ultimately reverted back to QWERTY for one reason: keyboard shortcuts! Control-C|V|Z are all transformed into either two-handed shortcuts or right-handed shortcuts. In either case, I can't copy/paste while selecting text with the mouse (since I'm right-handed). I now use Colemak (https://colemak.com/) which doesn't have this issue and I'm quite... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Not all keyboard layouts are born equal...
    Like, well, the original US layout, or Colemak. Suddenly, all those "hard-to-type" special characters and shortcuts start to make sense... Source: 12 months ago
  • Anyone have experience with Neovim and Colemak or Devorak keyboard layout?
    I started out using colemak.vim from the https://colemak.com webpage. Rather quickly I found that there were some things that I didn't like about the configuration, so I started modifying it. Eventually I had enough changes that I uploaded a fork of the configuration:. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Anyone have experience with Neovim and Colemak or Devorak keyboard layout?
    For reference, here's the keyboard layout: https://colemak.com/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Change the alphabet so it matches the order on the QWERTY keyboard. Everything that is currently organized in alphabetical order must be changed.
    Lets change all new keyboards to the Colemak layout, and change the order of the Alphabet to match. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Carpalx QGMLWB and Colemak, you can also consider the following products

Colemak Mod-DH - Colemak Mod-DH is a minor modification to the Colemak alternative keyboard layout, moving the heavily-used 'D' & 'H' keys to the bottom row assignments for both index fingers.

Programmer Dvorak - Almost Dvorak, optimized for programming tasks. This layout retains the classic Dvorak number order.

Carpalx QGMLWY - A Carpalx variant with V fixed in its QWERTY position.

NeO - NeO is a powerful outliner built for OS X.

Maltron Letter Layout - Also known as "Malt" for short.

Arensito - Designed by a programmer, for programming. Named for its home position letters. Also known as Hallingstad's layout, for its inventor.