Capybara VS Beta Testing

Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago

Extravagant yourself the educated sort? Assuming this is the case, you can get compensated to try out new sites and portable applications and chase down any errors. At http://UserTesting.com, for instance, you get to test new locales and items from brands like GoDaddy, Hello Fresh, HP, Subway and Canva. You simply have to have a solid WiFi association, a receiver, a PC or cell phone and you can get to work.... Source: over 1 year ago

I used https://betatesting.com/ recently (moderated) and they were really nice to deal with. Source: almost 2 years ago