Software Alternatives & Reviews

Capybara VS Appcues

Compare Capybara VS Appcues and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

Appcues logo Appcues

Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • Appcues Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

Appcues videos

Appcues - Product-Led Growth Review

More videos:

  • Review - Growth Talks #11 - Appcues & Userpilot - Homepage & Pricing Review - user onboarding apps!
  • Tutorial - How to Nail User Onboarding - Appcues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and Appcues)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
User Onboarding And Engagement
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
User Engagement
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and Appcues. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Capybara and Appcues

Capybara Reviews

We have no reviews of Capybara yet.
Be the first one to post

Appcues Reviews

15 best user onboarding software you need to try in 2023
It probably scores a little higher than Userpilot in terms of its visual styling and customization options, which are very easy on the eye. Appcues would be a good choice if you’re onboarding a design, ecommerce, or creativity tool. Among its clients are content-creation tool Writer and video collaboration platform Frame.io.
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
Appcues’s analytics isn’t much different from it’s close competitors, such as UserGuiding or Pendo. You can see al the data of your guides, surveys, checklists, and so on. What makes Appcues’s analytics strong are the “journeys” and “experiments” features, which allow you to play with custom parameters and dive deep into details.
Source: userguiding.com
The 7 Best WalkMe Alternatives in 2023
Its A/B testing and optimization features enable continuous improvement of user experiences. If you're seeking a no-code solution with powerful optimization capabilities, Appcues is an attractive option.
Source: helpjuice.com
Appcues Alternatives and Competitors
Even though it’s a “no-code” software, Appcues is not as easy-to-use as you might expect. If you have a small team with limited time, Appcues might not be for you because it still requires some time to be invested in the platform before you can effectively create onboarding flows. For the startups and SME’s Appcues might be on the expensive side of the onboarding tools.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Capybara seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Appcues mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Appcues yet. Tracking of Appcues recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and Appcues, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

UserGuiding - User onboarding made easy, for less. Create product walkthroughs in a couple of clicks, without breaking the bank.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Usetiful - Fight user churn with great user onboarding. Interactive product tours and smart tips significantly improve your user retention.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Userlane - Digital adoption platform with interactive guidance for software applications allowing anyone to understand and master any software from the get-go.