Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Caesium Image Compressor VS FLIF

Compare Caesium Image Compressor VS FLIF and see what are their differences

Caesium Image Compressor logo Caesium Image Compressor

Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.

FLIF logo FLIF

Free Lossless Image Format
  • Caesium Image Compressor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • FLIF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Caesium Image Compressor and FLIF)
Image Editing
94 94%
6% 6
Image Optimisation
93 93%
7% 7
Photos & Graphics
97 97%
3% 3
Image Effects
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Caesium Image Compressor and FLIF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Caesium Image Compressor might be a bit more popular than FLIF. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 9 links to FLIF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Caesium Image Compressor mentions (10)

View more

FLIF mentions (9)

  • JPEG XL gains support by a billion+ devices
    JXL contains FLIF, one of the most efficient lossless formats. Source: 11 months ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL (~3x smaller than JPEG, HDR, lossless, alpha, progressive, recompression, animations)
    As for lossless image compression, FLIF is based off of a deriviative of CABAC (used by H264) called MANIAC (which I couldn't find any information for). As mentioned on the website in general it outperforms PNG at around 33% smaller files. Interestingly enough, FLIF is a predecessor to JPEG-XL which is what this post is talking about. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL
    I'm a huge fan of AV1 for video, but for images JPEG-XL is simply the better codec than AVIF. If you've not actually looked closely at a comparison and are just on the side of AVIF in this debate because it's based on AV1 (and maybe you hate HEVC / HEIC), I'd urge you to look closer. Jpeg XL is pretty unrelated to Jpeg, Jpeg 2000 and Jpeg XR and instead a successor of Google Guetzli, FLIF and newer research. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    Legally they had no choice because jpeg xl is based on flif.info and https://github.com/google/pik but the flif has LGPL license which should open source the rest.. However regardless the media group didn't really do much other than write some standard and slap their name on it. Wasn't their work. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    No this is a niche format like FLIF was flif.info which got embedded in jpeg xl along with other image technologies. The tech behind QOI and many other things is great, and hopefully the research goes into usage in the future but it won't get mass adoption. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Caesium Image Compressor and FLIF, you can also consider the following products

DVDVideoSoft Image Convert and Resize - Free Image Convert and Resize is a compact yet powerful program for batch mode image processing.

ImageOptim - Faster web pages and apps.

XnConvert - XnConvert is an easy image converter for graphic files, photos and images available on Windows...

OptiPNG - OptiPNG is a command-line PNG optimizer that recompresses image files to a smaller size, without...

Ralpha Image Resizer - High-speed image batch conversion tool

JPEG Resampler - Jpeg Resampler, nástroj pro konverzi a změnu velikosti obrázků, snadné použití, zdarma