Business Catalyst VS Jekyll

Business Catalyst Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

Business Catalyst mentions (55)

• Adobe Express features unavailable to paying Creative Cloud users?

  The whole adobe.com experience isn't the most seamless, I might add. Source: 7 months ago

• Strange "Adobe Dating" email from message@adobe.com?

  Idk what this is haha, has my email address in the body. Definitely not clicking that link, but the adobe.com email address seems legit so I'm just puzzled what it means. Maybe Adobes tryna set me up with someone ;). Source: 10 months ago

• Moving from Lightroom Mobile to Full version on MacBook

  You can go to adobe.com and subscribe to the Photography Plan. Source: about 1 year ago

• Is Edge Animate still available somewhere?

  Huh, I just looked a little more carefully and it seems like the links redirect from prodesigntools.com to adobe.com. They sure would seem more legit if they just showed the direct link to Adobe. Source: about 1 year ago

• Looking to get into Premiere Pro

  The only "deal" to be had is to subscribe directly through adobe.com. Source: about 1 year ago

Jekyll mentions (180)

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago