Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bulma VS XSLT in-browser implementation

Compare Bulma VS XSLT in-browser implementation and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Bulma logo Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

XSLT in-browser implementation logo XSLT in-browser implementation

XSLT is a cross-browser API for converting XML data into string or virtual DOM implemented natively with multithreaded streaming processing.
  • Bulma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14
  • XSLT in-browser implementation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-28

Bulma features and specs

  • Simple and Elegant Design
    Bulma offers a clean, modern aesthetic that looks great out of the box. This eliminates much of the need for extensive customization to achieve a professional look.
  • Responsive Layouts
    Bulma is built with a flexible grid system that ensures your designs are responsive. This makes it straightforward to create web pages that look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Bulma has a straightforward class-based syntax that is easy to understand and implement. This simplifies the development process, especially for newcomers.
  • BEM Methodology
    Bulma employs Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology for CSS, which helps in writing clean, understandable, and scalable code.
  • No JavaScript Dependencies
    Bulma is purely a CSS framework, meaning it doesn't come bundled with JavaScript. This allows you to integrate it with any JavaScript framework of your choice, like React or Vue.js, without any conflicts.
  • Well-Documented
    The official Bulma website has extensive documentation, including examples and code snippets, which makes it easier to learn and implement.
  • Active Community
    Bulma has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and are available for support, which can be helpful when facing issues or needing guidance.

Possible disadvantages of Bulma

  • Limited Customizability
    While Bulma is designed to be easy to use, its simplicity can sometimes limit your ability to customize components as deeply as you might be able to with other frameworks.
  • Lack of Components
    Bulma does not come with as many built-in components as some other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. You might find yourself needing to create custom components for some features.
  • No JavaScript
    The lack of built-in JavaScript functionality means you will need to write or integrate JavaScript separately for more interactive elements, such as modals or carousels.
  • Performance Overhead
    Like most CSS frameworks, using Bulma can introduce some performance overhead due to unused CSS. You'll need to use a tool like PurgeCSS to remove unused styles for optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simplicity, there can still be a learning curve for developers who are accustomed to other frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Small Community compared to Others
    While the community is active, it is smaller compared to more established frameworks like Bootstrap, potentially making it harder to find solutions to less common issues.
  • Semantic Class Names
    Bulma emphasizes semantic class names following the BEM methodology, which can be verbose and may require a change in practice for some developers.

XSLT in-browser implementation features and specs

  • Client-Side Processing
    XSLT processing in the browser shifts the computational load from servers to clients, potentially reducing server load and making better use of client-side resources.
  • Dynamic Page Updates
    XSLT can enable real-time updates to the DOM structure, allowing for dynamic content adjustment based on XML data inputs without needing to reload the web page.
  • Separation of Concerns
    XSLT allows developers to separate the logic for transforming XML data from HTML layout, leading to more organized and maintainable code.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Being an established standardized technology, XSLT is supported by most modern web browsers, enabling good cross-browser functionality.
  • Rich XML Support
    XSLT is designed to handle XML data efficiently, making it a good choice for applications that heavily depend on XML formats.

Possible disadvantages of XSLT in-browser implementation

  • Performance Overhead
    Client-side XSLT transformations can introduce performance overhead, especially on devices with limited processing power or when dealing with large datasets.
  • Complexity
    XSLT has its own syntax that may require a separate learning curve for developers familiar only with JavaScript and HTML, potentially increasing development time.
  • Limited Error Handling
    XSLT lacks robust error handling capabilities, which might make debugging and handling transformation errors more challenging.
  • Inconsistent Browser Support
    While generally supported, XSLT features can behave inconsistently across different browser versions, requiring additional testing and validation.
  • Security Concerns
    Processing XML in the browser might introduce security risks such as exposing internal data structures or vulnerabilities related to XML external entities (XXE).

Bulma videos

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

  • Review - S.H. Figuarts Dragon Ball Adventure Begins Bulma Review
  • Review - Bandai SH Figuarts BULMA Review BR / DiegoHDM

XSLT in-browser implementation videos

No XSLT in-browser implementation videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bulma and XSLT in-browser implementation)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bulma and XSLT in-browser implementation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bulma and XSLT in-browser implementation

Bulma Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
I chose Bulma for its efficient use of Flexbox, a layout model that allows a responsive design with minimal effort. This efficiency sets Bulma apart from many other CSS frameworks. In my judgment, Bulma stands out as the best choice for developers seeking a powerful, Flexbox-based CSS framework for creating flexible and intuitive web designs.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Suppose you want to learn the valuable skill of working with the mobile-first Bulma framework. In that case, we highly recommend taking the "Master Bulma CSS Framework" course by Jeppe Schaumburg Jensen on Udemy. In this course, you will master the latest version of Bulma and create real projects and themes while learning HTML, web design, and coding.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Bulma comes with a beautiful range of colors out-of-the-box, and it won’t be wrong if we call it the most beautiful framework out there in the market. It can be used directly to get really nice-looking websites with the very least effort.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Bulma’s simplicity, extensive documentation, and community support make it a popular choice for projects of all sizes. Whether you’re building a landing page, a dashboard, or an eCommerce site, Bulma provides a solid foundation for building aesthetically pleasing and functional interfaces.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Although new, Bulma has quickly climbed up the list of top 10 CSS frameworks. It has no JavaScript components (no .js) and the most readable CSS classes. To create grids, Bulma has a powerful system known as tiles, making the page elegant and neat. It is highly modular and easy to learn. Although small, Bulma has a community of passionate individuals wanting to change the...
Source: hackr.io

XSLT in-browser implementation Reviews

We have no reviews of XSLT in-browser implementation yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bulma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 115 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bulma mentions (115)

View more

XSLT in-browser implementation mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XSLT in-browser implementation yet. Tracking of XSLT in-browser implementation recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bulma and XSLT in-browser implementation, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

EJS - An open source JavaScript Template library.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax