Bulma

Website

bulma.io

$ Details

Categories

#CSS Framework #Development Tools #Design Tools #Developer Tools

NativeScript

Website

nativescript.org

$ Details

Categories

#Development Tools #JavaScript Framework #Developer Tools #Javascript UI Libraries

Bulma features and specs

• Simple and Elegant Design
  Bulma offers a clean, modern aesthetic that looks great out of the box. This eliminates much of the need for extensive customization to achieve a professional look.
• Responsive Layouts
  Bulma is built with a flexible grid system that ensures your designs are responsive. This makes it straightforward to create web pages that look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
• Ease of Use
  Bulma has a straightforward class-based syntax that is easy to understand and implement. This simplifies the development process, especially for newcomers.
• BEM Methodology
  Bulma employs Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology for CSS, which helps in writing clean, understandable, and scalable code.
• No JavaScript Dependencies
  Bulma is purely a CSS framework, meaning it doesn't come bundled with JavaScript. This allows you to integrate it with any JavaScript framework of your choice, like React or Vue.js, without any conflicts.
• Well-Documented
  The official Bulma website has extensive documentation, including examples and code snippets, which makes it easier to learn and implement.
• Active Community
  Bulma has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and are available for support, which can be helpful when facing issues or needing guidance.

Possible disadvantages of Bulma

• Limited Customizability
  While Bulma is designed to be easy to use, its simplicity can sometimes limit your ability to customize components as deeply as you might be able to with other frameworks.
• Lack of Components
  Bulma does not come with as many built-in components as some other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. You might find yourself needing to create custom components for some features.
• No JavaScript
  The lack of built-in JavaScript functionality means you will need to write or integrate JavaScript separately for more interactive elements, such as modals or carousels.
• Performance Overhead
  Like most CSS frameworks, using Bulma can introduce some performance overhead due to unused CSS. You'll need to use a tool like PurgeCSS to remove unused styles for optimal performance.
• Learning Curve
  Despite its simplicity, there can still be a learning curve for developers who are accustomed to other frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
• Small Community compared to Others
  While the community is active, it is smaller compared to more established frameworks like Bootstrap, potentially making it harder to find solutions to less common issues.
• Semantic Class Names
  Bulma emphasizes semantic class names following the BEM methodology, which can be verbose and may require a change in practice for some developers.

NativeScript features and specs

• Cross-Platform Development
  NativeScript allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android, which saves time and resources.
• Native Performance
  Since NativeScript directly uses native components, it delivers high performance comparable to native applications, unlike some other cross-platform solutions.
• Rich Ecosystem
  NativeScript offers a rich ecosystem of plugins and modules, making it easy to extend functionalities and integrate with various services.
• Single Codebase
  Maintaining a single codebase for both iOS and Android reduces development and debugging efforts.
• Open Source
  Being open source, NativeScript has strong community support and continuous improvements driven by developers around the world.
• Access to Native APIs
  NativeScript allows direct access to native APIs, giving developers more flexibility and control over platform-specific features.

Possible disadvantages of NativeScript

• Steep Learning Curve
  The framework requires an understanding of native development concepts, which can be complex for new developers or those not familiar with mobile development.
• Lack of Third-Party Components
  Compared to more mature frameworks, NativeScript has a limited number of third-party libraries and UI components available.
• Performance Overhead
  Despite high performance, there is still some overhead compared to fully native applications due to the abstraction layer.
• Limited Community Support
  Although the community is growing, it is still smaller compared to mainstream frameworks like React Native or Flutter, which might result in slower issue resolution and fewer resources.
• Maintenance and Updates
  Keeping the framework and its plugins up to date with the latest iOS and Android releases can be challenging and resource-intensive.

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

NativeScript VS React Native 2019 | performance | community | plugins

More videos: