Software Alternatives & Reviews

Bull VS Puma

Compare Bull VS Puma and see what are their differences

Bull logo Bull

Bull is a Node library that implements a fast and robust queue system based on redis.

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.
  • Bull Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

Bull videos

Designated Survivor​ Review​, Bull Review - Keifer Sutherland, Michael Weatherly

More videos:

  • Review - Bull power585 tractor price and owner review
  • Review - Energy Crisis--Energy Drink Review #150 Red Bull Summer Edition

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bull and Puma)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bull and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bull and Puma

Bull Reviews

We have no reviews of Bull yet.
Be the first one to post

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma should be more popular than Bull. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bull mentions (1)

  • Crone Job with dynamic interval
    Use bull queue with “delay” parameter. You can create as many jobs scheduled that way as you want. https://optimalbits.github.io/bull/. Source: about 1 year ago

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bull and Puma, you can also consider the following products

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.