Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS Commit Together by Github

Compare BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

PhotoG.art
The World's First AI Marketing Agent featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

BuildJet for GitHub Actions features and specs

  • Cost Efficiency
    BuildJet provides a more cost-effective solution by offering competitive pricing compared to other cloud-based CI/CD services, helping teams reduce their continuous integration and deployment expenses.
  • Faster Builds
    With BuildJet, GitHub Actions users can experience faster build times by utilizing optimized infrastructure, allowing for quicker feedback and iteration cycles.
  • Seamless Integration
    BuildJet integrates smoothly with GitHub Actions, providing an enhanced user experience without requiring significant changes to existing workflows.
  • Scalability
    The platform can easily scale with your project's needs, accommodating both small teams with minimal workloads and larger teams with extensive CI/CD requirements.

Possible disadvantages of BuildJet for GitHub Actions

  • Dependency on Third-party
    Using BuildJet means relying on an external service, which can introduce concerns regarding data privacy, service reliability, and long-term availability.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a newer or less widely adopted solution, BuildJet might not offer as extensive a range of features or plugins as other, more established CI/CD platforms.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users new to BuildJet might face a learning curve as they adapt to the platform's specific functionalities and integration nuances.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Commit Together by Github)

BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Commit Together by Github

Developer Tools
38 38%
Developer Tools
62% 62
Productivity
36 36%
Productivity
64% 64
Tech
100 100%
Tech
0% 0
User Experience
0 0%
User Experience
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

RunsOn - Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Social Post - A simple way to send messages from GitHub Actions

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Loading...