Software Alternatives & Reviews

BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS CodeStream

Compare BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS CodeStream and see what are their differences

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

CodeStream logo CodeStream

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04
  • CodeStream Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-15

CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions videos

No BuildJet for GitHub Actions videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

CodeStream videos

CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE

More videos:

  • Review - CodeStream
  • Review - CodeStream introduces in-IDE Code Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BuildJet for GitHub Actions and CodeStream)
Productivity
42 42%
58% 58
Developer Tools
21 21%
79% 79
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using BuildJet for GitHub Actions and CodeStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BuildJet for GitHub Actions and CodeStream

BuildJet for GitHub Actions Reviews

We have no reviews of BuildJet for GitHub Actions yet.
Be the first one to post

CodeStream Reviews

  1. Great Product

    After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.

    👍 Pros:    Well designed|Works perfectly

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

CodeStream mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeStream yet. Tracking of CodeStream recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BuildJet for GitHub Actions and CodeStream, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

GitLive - Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

RunsOn - Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Actionsflow - Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions

Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion