No BuilderX videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than BuilderX. While we know about 180 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 5 mentions of BuilderX. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
A browser-based design tool that codes React Native & React for you. Website. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Do you know on tool that do layout editor for react-native something like https://builderx.io/ ? The idea that you can drag and drop and then you will get a layout. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
This isn't true by the way - there are a bunch. I have used them in the past for example https://builderx.io/ and they are pretty developed,. Source: almost 2 years ago
I had a look at Firebase and also followed a tutorial making a Login- and Registration-page. Seems easy and does the job. I had a look at https://builderx.io/ where I could probably easily create the structure. But I'm afraid to start at the wrong ends or do it too complicated, so please:. Source: over 2 years ago
For frontend I only found https://builderx.io/ to be both decent and "open-source". For backend I'm working on this one (release soon): https://app.codoma.tech/landing/. Source: about 3 years ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Anima App - Design, get feedback, convert to code, publish, iterate.
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.
Monday Hero - Convert design into mobile code 😎
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.