Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

bttn.css VS Animista

Compare bttn.css VS Animista and see what are their differences

bttn.css logo bttn.css

Awesome buttons for awesome projects!

Animista logo Animista

Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser
  • bttn.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29
  • Animista Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-29

bttn.css features and specs

  • Simplicity
    bttn.css provides a simple way to add visually appealing buttons to web projects without requiring deep knowledge of CSS.
  • Lightweight
    The library is minimal in size, reducing load times and keeping projects fast and responsive.
  • Variety
    It offers a range of pre-designed buttons, allowing for easy customization and experimentation with styles.
  • Ease of Integration
    bttn.css can be easily integrated into existing projects, allowing developers to enhance UI with minimal changes to their codebase.

Possible disadvantages of bttn.css

  • Limited Customization
    While it offers a variety of styles, the scope for customization is limited compared to writing custom CSS or using more comprehensive libraries.
  • Dependency
    Relying on an external library, however minimal, can introduce dependency risks such as lack of future updates or changes in URL hosting.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    bttn.css focuses on button styling and doesn't provide advanced features that more comprehensive frameworks might offer, such as accessibility options.
  • Community and Support
    Being a niche library, it might have a smaller community, leading to fewer resources, tutorials, and support compared to larger CSS frameworks.

Animista features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Animista features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for users of all skill levels to create and customize CSS animations.
  • Variety of Animation Options
    The platform offers a wide range of pre-built animations, allowing users to explore and select from various styles and effects for their projects.
  • Real-Time Preview
    Users can see real-time previews of the animations as they customize them, which helps in making quick and informed adjustments.
  • Quick Export
    Animista provides an easy way to generate and export the CSS code for the animations, streamlining the development process.
  • Customization Controls
    The platform allows users to modify the duration, delay, and other properties of the animations, offering a high level of customization.

Possible disadvantages of Animista

  • Limited to CSS
    Animista focuses purely on CSS animations, which may not cover all animation needs, especially those requiring JavaScript or other more advanced techniques.
  • No Project Save Feature
    There is no inherent feature to save projects or settings within the tool, which means users have to reconfigure settings if they navigate away or close the browser.
  • Lack of Advanced Animation Features
    While the tool offers a variety of basic and intermediate animations, it may fall short for users needing highly complex or intricate animation sequences.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Animista is an online tool, so a stable internet connection is required to use it. This might be a limitation for users with unreliable internet access.
  • Potential Overhead
    Adding multiple animations generated from Animista might increase the CSS file size, potentially impacting website performance if not managed properly.

bttn.css videos

No bttn.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Animista videos

CSS Animations with Animista: Tool School 003

More videos:

  • Review - Creating easy CSS Animations in Muse with Animista

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bttn.css and Animista)
Design Tools
21 21%
79% 79
Developer Tools
24 24%
76% 76
CSS Framework
25 25%
75% 75
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using bttn.css and Animista. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animista seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bttn.css mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of bttn.css yet. Tracking of bttn.css recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Animista mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bttn.css and Animista, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

CSSRooster - Bot that writes CSS classes for HTML with deep learning

Keyframes.app - A timeline editor for CSS animations

Instagram.css - Complete set of Instagram filters in pure CSS

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library