Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

browserling VS mozjpeg

Compare browserling VS mozjpeg and see what are their differences

browserling logo browserling

Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

mozjpeg logo mozjpeg

Mozilla JPEG Encoder Project
  • browserling Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-19
  • mozjpeg Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

browserling videos

LambdaTest vs Browserling - Browser Compatibility Testing Tools Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - Browserling problem solved | WhatsApp on Jio phone | install WhatsApp on Jio phone

mozjpeg videos

No mozjpeg videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to browserling and mozjpeg)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Game Development
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Game Engine
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using browserling and mozjpeg. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mozjpeg should be more popular than browserling. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

browserling mentions (6)

  • No more porn in utah. Get me out of here
    Https://browserling.com Browser inside of a browser. Gets past annoying ass firewalls. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is Opening a suspicious link in a virtual machine is safe to the host?
    I don't use my own vm - I use https://browserling.com - you only get 2 minutes but very easy and quick to check a link out. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Accidently clicked malicious link
    Redirects you to a YouTube video. Plugged this into browserling.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Local network url bypass
    Basically, I have recently got my hands on a rasperry pi, I love it! I have a homelab, but it just doesnt have the functionality of portability. So, if there was someone on my network with a firewall that blocked urls within the brower, is it possible that there is some software that host a webserver, but simply passes through html with a url on the top. If you dont understand me, what I am saying is, is it... Source: over 2 years ago
  • [DISCORD IN SCHOOL] PS + Browserling - Essentially unblockable
    "" * Want to access Discord from school? Use this method * Step #1: Go to https://browserling.com Step #2: Click on "Internet Explorer" and change it to "Chrome" Step #3: Type "https://proxyscrape.com/web-proxy" in the box of Browserling Step #4: Press enter, and wait for it to load. When it's done, type "discord.com" in the PS website Step #5: Wait for it to load. Once it does, click the menu icon at the top and... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

mozjpeg mentions (13)

  • It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs
    It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Random Code Inspiration Volume 2
    Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going
    > MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1
    FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?
    No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing browserling and mozjpeg, you can also consider the following products

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

libjpeg-turbo - libjpeg-turbo is a derivative of libjpeg that uses SIMD instructions (MMX, SSE2, NEON) to...

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Guetzli - JPEG encoder from Google Research that aims for great compression with high visual quality.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

libjpeg - libjpeg is a widely-used free software library written in C which implements JPEG decoding and...