Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Box Shadow Generator VS Animate.css

Compare Box Shadow Generator VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Box Shadow Generator logo Box Shadow Generator

Generating CSS3 multilayer box-shadow has never been easier.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
Not present
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Box Shadow Generator features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Real-Time Preview
    It offers a real-time preview of the shadow effect, allowing users to see changes instantly and iterate quickly.
  • Customizability
    Provides a wide range of customization options for shadow parameters, such as offset, blur, and spread, giving users full control over the design.
  • CSS Code Generation
    Automatically generates the CSS code for the configured box shadow, making it easy to integrate into web projects.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Generates code that is compatible with major browsers, ensuring consistent results across different platforms.
  • Save and Export Options
    Allows users to save and export their shadow settings, making it easy to replicate effects or share designs with team members.

Possible disadvantages of Box Shadow Generator

  • Limited to Box Shadows
    Focuses solely on box-shadow effects and does not support other CSS shadow properties like text-shadow, limiting its use for broader design needs.
  • Online Dependence
    Requires an internet connection to access and use the tool, which could be a drawback for offline work scenarios.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    While user-friendly, beginners with no prior CSS knowledge might need a short period to understand the implications of each setting.
  • Potential Over-reliance
    Users might become overly dependent on the tool for generating shadows, inhibiting their ability to learn and write CSS manually.

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Box Shadow Generator and Animate.css)
Design Tools
29 29%
71% 71
Developer Tools
26 26%
74% 74
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Box Shadow Generator and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Box Shadow Generator mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Box Shadow Generator yet. Tracking of Box Shadow Generator recommendations started around Dec 2021.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Box Shadow Generator and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

Glassmorphism - A modern CSS UI library based on glassmorphism

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Tailwind Box Shadows - A curated list of box shadows for your next web project.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Glass UI Generator - CSS generator for glassmorphism

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library