Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Glassmorphism VS Animate.css

Compare Glassmorphism VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Glassmorphism logo Glassmorphism

A modern CSS UI library based on glassmorphism

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
  • Glassmorphism Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Glassmorphism features and specs

  • Aesthetic Appeal
    Glassmorphism offers a visually appealing and modern look that can make interfaces feel fresh and contemporary, adding an element of depth through blurred backgrounds and transparency effects.
  • Focus on Content
    By providing a frosted glass effect, Glassmorphism can help place more emphasis on foreground content, allowing users to focus better on the important elements of the UI.
  • Layering and Depth
    The use of translucency and blurred backgrounds helps create a sense of hierarchy and depth, making the UI more intuitive and structured.

Possible disadvantages of Glassmorphism

  • Performance Issues
    Implementing the transparency and blur effects essential to Glassmorphism might demand more from the hardware, potentially leading to performance issues on less powerful devices.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Glassmorphism can sometimes reduce contrast, making it challenging for users with visual impairments to interact with the UI, potentially violating accessibility guidelines.
  • Overuse and Clutter
    Using too much glassmorphic design can result in a cluttered and overwhelming UI, detracting from its usability and overpowering the actual content.

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Glassmorphism videos

Glassmorphism 2.0 - full style breakdown

More videos:

  • Review - Glassmorphism - A New UI Trend for 2021?!
  • Review - I created Neumorphism, Glassmorphism and Aurora

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Glassmorphism and Animate.css)
Design Tools
41 41%
59% 59
Developer Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Glassmorphism and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Animate.css might be a bit more popular than Glassmorphism. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Glassmorphism. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Glassmorphism mentions (1)

  • Glassmorphism tutorial - learn how to implement the new design trend using only HTML and CSS
    You can sign up for updates and be announced when the project is released at ui.glass. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Glassmorphism and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

Storefront UI - The first Vue.js UI library dedicated to eCommerce

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Clippy - CSS Clip-path Maker - Drag and points to generate clip-path CSS

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Glassmorphism CSS Generator - Generate the CSS for frosted glass effect for FREE.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library